RuEn

Journal section "Innovative development"

Shared Values in the Formation of a Modern Techno-Economic Paradigm

Romanova O.A., Akberdina V.V., Bukhvalov N.Y.

3 (45), 2016

Romanova O.A., Akberdina V.V., Bukhvalov N.Y. Shared Values in the Formation of a Modern Techno-Economic Paradigm. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2016, no. 3 (45), pp. 173-190. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2016.3.45.10

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2016.3.45.10

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Akaev A.A. Bol’shie tsikly kon»yunktury i innovatsionno-tsiklicheskaya teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Shumpetera–Kondrat’eva [Large cycles of conjuncture and the Schumpeter–Kondratiev innovative-cyclical theory of economic development]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii [Economic science in modern Russia], 2013, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 7-29. [in Russian].
  2. Akaev A.A., Rumyantseva S.Yu., Sarygulov A.I., Sokolov V.N. O strukturno-tekhnologicheskoi paradigme tekhnologicheskoi modernizatsii ekonomiki [On the structural-technological paradigm of technological modernization of the economy]. Kondrat’evskie volny [Kondratiev waves], 2015, no. 4, pp. 23-53. [in Russian].
  3. Babikova A.V. Gosudarstvennye promyshlennye korporatsii i formirovanie novoi tekhniko-ekonomicheskoi paradigmy: strategiya innovatsionnogo razvitiya [State industrial corporations and the formation of a new techno-economic paradigm: innovation development strategy]. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta upravleniya i ekonomiki [Bulletin of Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics], 2015, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 19-22. [in Russian].
  4. Brazevich D.S. Sovremennyi nauchnyi diskurs po probleme innovatsii: ot tekhniko-ekonomicheskoi paradigmy k sotsiokul’turnoi [Modern scientific discourse on the issue of innovation: from feasibility to sociocultural paradigm]. Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya: Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment [Scientific journal NRU ITMO. Series “Economics and Environmental Management”], 2014, no. 4, pp. 50-54. [in Russian].
  5. Bukhvalov N.Yu. Impakt-menedzhment i ierarkhichnost’ mul’tiintellektual’noi sistemy upravleniya vysokotekhnologichnym predpriyatiem [Bukhvalov N. Yu. Impact management and hierarchy of a multi-intellectual system for managing a high-tech enterprise]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii [Russian journal of economic theory], 2016, no. 2, pp. 48-56. [in Russian].
  6. Gureev P.M. Transdistsiplinarnaya kontseptsiya tsiklicheskogo razvitiya tekhniko-ekonomicheskoi paradigmy [Transdisciplinary conception of cyclical nature of technical-economic paradigm development]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and practice of social development], 2016, no. 3, pp. 55-58. [in Russian].
  7. Glazyev S.Yu., Mikerin G.I., Teslya P.N. et al. Dlinnye volny: nauchno-tekhnicheskii progress i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie [Long waves: scientific and technological progress and socio-economic development]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, Sibirskoe otdelenie, 1991. 224 p. [in Russian].
  8. Dmitrii Medvedev vyvel formulu inklyuzivnogo razvitiya ekonomiki Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskogo regiona [Dmitry Medvedev derived a formula for inclusive economic development of Asia and the Pacific]. Available at: http:// bujet.ru/article/126201.php. [in Russian].
  9. Zakon Sverdlovskoi oblasti ot 21 dekabrya 2015 g. № 151-OZ “O Strategii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sverdlovskoi oblasti na 2016–2030 gody” [Law of the Sverdlovsk Oblast dated December 21, 2015 No. 151-OZ “On the strategy for socio-economic development of the Sverdlovsk Oblast for 2016–2030”]. Available at: http:// www.garant.ru/hotlaw/sverdlovsk/679712/#ixzz46Ls3EZpx. [in Russian].
  10. Kokoshin A., Bartenev V. Problemy vzaimozavisimosti bezopasnosti i razvitiya v strategicheskom planirovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: ot tselepolaganiya k prognozirovaniyu [The issues of interdependence between security and development in strategic planning in the Russian Federation: from goal setting to forecasting]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian economic development], 2015, no. 6, pp. 6-17. [in Russian].
  11. Konkurentosposobnost’ sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem: vyzovy novogo vremeni [Competitiveness of socioeconomic systems: challenges of the new era]. Under the scientific editorship of A.I. Tatarkin and V.V. Krivorotov. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2014. 466 p. [in Russian].
  12. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii [The structure of scientific revolutions]. Moscow: Progress, 1997. 300 p. [in Russian].
  13. Malyshkin P.A., Tanina M.A. Formirovanie sistemy preobrazhayushchikh investitsii v territorial’nom obshchestvennom samoupravlenii [Formation of the system of transforming investment in territorial public self-government]. Nauchnye zapiski molodykh issledovatelei [Scientific notes of young researchers], 2016, no. 1, pp. 52-62. [in Russian].
  14. Perez C. Tekhnologicheskie revolyutsii i finansovyi kapital. Dinamika puzyrei i periodov protsvetaniya [Technological revolutions and financial capital: the dynamics of bubbles and golden ages]. Moscow: Delo; RANKhiGS, 2011. 232 p. [in Russian].
  15. Filatova M.G. Strukturnaya perestroika promyshlennosti: sushchnost’, zakonomernosti, mekhanizm gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya [Structural reorganization of the industry: the nature, regularities and mechanism of state regulation]. Yekaterinburg: UrO RAN, 1999. 227 p. [in Russian].
  16. Reichheld F., Markey R. Iskrennyaya loyal’nost’. Klyuch k zavoevaniyu klientov na vsyu zhizn’ [The ultimate question 2.0: how net promoter companies thrive in a customer-driven world]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2012. 352 p. [in Russian].
  17. Elkington J. Lyudoedy s vilkami [Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of twenty-first century business]. Available at: http://appli6.hec.fr/amo/Public/Files/Docs/148_en.pdf
  18. Yurasov I.A., Bondarenko V.V., Tanina M.A., Yudina V.A. Modelirovanie sistemy impakt-investirovaniya v razvitie informatsionno-kommunikatsionnoi infrastruktury seti territorial’nogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya [Modeling the system for impact investments in the development of information and communication infrasructure of the network of territorial public self-government]. Upravlenie razvitiem territorii na osnove preobrazhayushchikh investitsii [Management of territory’s development based on transforming investments]. Ed.by V.V. Bondarenko. Penza: Izd-vo PGU, 2015. Pp. 209-217. [in Russian].
  19. Yurasov I.A., Bondarenko V.V., Tanina M.A., Yudina V.A. Kontseptualizatsiya ponyatiya preobrazuyushchikh investitsii v sfere territorial’nogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya na osnove modelirovaniya setevogo upravleniya territoriei [Conceptualizing the notion of transformative investment in territorial public self-government based on the modeling of network management of a territory]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Obshchestvennye nauki [News of higher educational institutions. Volga Region. Social Sciences], 2015, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 143-160. [in Russian].
  20. Barnes T. New economic geography. The Dictionary of Human Geography. Ed. by D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M.J. Watts, S. Whatmore. 5th edition. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 500 p.
  21. Castells M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. vol. 1 (1996), vol. 2 (1997), vol. 3 (1998). Oxford: Blackwell.
  22. Dinc M., Haynes K.E. Sources of regional inefficiency: an integrated shift-share, data envelopment analysis and input-output approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 1999, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 469-489.
  23. Fujita M., Krugman P. The new economic geography: past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science, 2004, vol. 83, pp. 139-164;
  24. Lall S.V., Yilmaz S. Regional economic convergence: Do policy instruments make a difference? The Annals of Regional Science, 2001, vol.35, no. 1, p. 160.
  25. Leijonhufvud C., O’Donohoe N., Saltuk Y., Bugg-Levine A., Brandenburg M. Impact Investment. J.P. Morgan Global Research, 2010. Available at: http://ventureatlanta.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/JP-Morgan-impact_investments_nov2010.pdf
  26. Porter M. E., Kramer M.R. Creating shared value: redefining capitalism and the role of the corporation in society. Harvard Business Review, 2011, January/February, vol. 89, no. 1/2, pp. 62-77.
  27. Porter M., Kramer M. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 2011, no. 1, 17 p. Reprint R1101C. Available at: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/fellows/N_Lovegrove_Study_Group/Session_1/Michael_ Porter_Creating_Shared_Value.pdf

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article