VolRC RAS scientific journal
RuEn

Journal section "Public finances"

Priorities of Budget Financing of Cities and Regions of the Russian North

Timushev E.N.

Volume 12, Issue 1, 2019

Timushev E.N. Priorities of budget financing of cities and regions of the Russian North. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2019, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 174-188. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.1.61.10

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.1.61.10

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Filimon R., Romer T., Rosenthal H. Asymmetric information and agenda control: the bases of monopoly power in public spending. Journal of Public Economics, 1982, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 51-70.
  2. Wyckoff G. The elusive flypaper effect. Journal of Urban Economics, 1991, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 310-328.
  3. Hines J.R., Thaler R.H. The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 217-226.
  4. Bailey S.J., Connolly S. The flypaper effect: identifying areas for further research. Public Choice, 1998, vol. 95, no. ¾, pp. 335-361.
  5. Gordon N. Do federal grants boost school spending? Evidence from Title I. Journal of Public Economics, 2004, vol. 88 (9–10), pp. 1771-1792. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.09.002
  6. Knight B. Endogenous federal grants and crowd-out of state government spending: theory and evidence from the federal highway aid program. American Economic Review, 2002, vol. 92 (1), pp. 71-92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015612
  7. Moffitt R.A. The effects of grants-in-aid on state and local expenditures: the case of AFDC. Journal of Public Economics, 1984, vol. 23 (3), pp. 279-305. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(84)90032-X
  8. Yu Y., Wang J., Tian X. Identifying the flypaper effect in the presence of spatial dependence: evidence from education in China’s counties. Growth and Change, 2016, vol. 47 (1), pp. 93-110. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12113
  9. Becker E. The illusion of fiscal illusion: unsticking the flypaper effect. Public Choice, 1996, vol. 86 (1–2), pp. 85–102. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114876
  10. Megdal S.B. The flypaper effect revisited: an econometric explanation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987, vol. 69 (2), pp. 347-351. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1927243
  11. Worthington A.C., Dollery B.E. Fiscal illusion and the Australian local government grants process: how sticky is the flypaper effect? Public Choice, 1999, vol. 99 (1-2), pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018329802757.
  12. Gamkhar S., Shah A. The impact of intergovernmental transfers: a synthesis of the conceptual and empirical literature. In: Boadway R., Shah A. (Eds.). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice. Public Sector Governance and Accountability. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2007. Pp. 225-258.
  13. Zampelli E. Resource fungibility, the flypaper effect, and the expenditure impact of grants-in-aid. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1986, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 33–40.
  14. Oates W.E. On the nature and measurement of fiscal illusion: a survey. In: Brennan G. et al. (Eds.). Taxation and Fiscal Federalism: Essays in Honour of Russell Mathews. Sydney: Australian National University Press, 1988. Pp. 65-82.
  15. Gramlich E.M., Galper H., Goldfeld S., Mcguire M. State and local fiscal federal behavior and federal grant policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1973, vol. 1, pp. 15-65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2534084
  16. Khilji N.M., Zampelli E.M. The fungibility of US assistance to developing countries and the impact on recipient expenditures: a case study of Pakistan. World Development, 1991, vol. 19 (8), pp. 1095-1105. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90127-4.
  17. Van de Walle D., Mu R. Fungibility and the flypaper effect of project aid: micro-evidence for Vietnam. Journal of Development Economics, 2007, vol. 84 (2), pp. 667-685. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.12.005.
  18. Oulasvirta L. Real and perceived effects of changing the grant system from specific to general grants. Public Choice, 1997, vol. 91 (3), pp. 397-416. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004987824891
  19. Bracco E., Lockwood B., Porcelli F., Redoano M. Intergovernmental grants as signals and the alignment effect: theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 2015, vol. 123 (Supplement C), pp. 78-91. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.11.007
  20. Witterblad M. Income heterogeneity and the flypaper effect. Umeå Economic Studies, 2007, no. 718. Available at: http://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/umnees/0718.html
  21. Singhal M. Special interest groups and the allocation of public funds. Journal of Public Economics, 2008, vol. 92 (3-4), pp. 548-564. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.05.005.
  22. Deller S.C., Maher C.S. Categorical municipal expenditures with a focus on the flypaper effect. Public Budgeting & Finance, 2005, vol. 25 (3), pp. 73-90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00368
  23. Kadochnikov P., Sinel'nikov-Murylev S., Trunin I. Sistema federal'noi finansovoi podderzhki regionov v Rossii i ee vliyanie na nalogovuyu i byudzhetnuyu politiku sub"ektov Federatsii [System of Federal Financial Support of Russian Regions and its Impact on the Tax and Budget Policy of the Subjects of the Federation]. Мoscow : Institut Gaidara, 2002.
  24. Freinkman L., Plekhanov A. Fiscal decentralization in rentier regions. Ekonomicheskaya politika=Economic Policy, 2008, no. 1, pp. 103-123. (In Russian).
  25. Idrisova V., Freinkman L. Influence of Federal transfers on fiscal behavior of regional authorities. Nauchnye Trudy=Scientific Works, no. 137Р. Мoscow : Izd-vo Instituta ekonomiki perekhodnogo perioda, 2010. (In Russian).
  26. Logan R. Fiscal illusion and the grantor government. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 1304–1318.

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article