RuEn

Journal section "Development of municipal formations"

Creating a Comfortable Urban Environment: Problems of Interaction between Society and Government in the Implementation of Priority Projects at the Management Municipal Level

Maksimov A.M., Nenasheva M.V., Vereshchagin I.F., Shubina T.F., Shubina P.V.

Volume 14, Issue 1, 2021

Maksimov A.M., Nenasheva M.V., Vereshchagin I.F., Shubina T.F., Shubina P.V. Creating a comfortable urban environment: problems of interaction between society and government in the implementation of priority projects at the management municipal level. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 1. pp. 71–90. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.6

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.6

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Wirth L. Urbanism as a way of life. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 11. Sotsiologiya: Referativnyi zhurnal=Social and Human Sciences. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Ser. 11. Sociology: Abstract Journal, 1997, no. 3, pp. 169–196 (in Russian).
  2. Rousdepp M. Environment as a place for behavior (Roger Barker School of Environmental Psychology). In: Chelovek v sotsial'noi i fizicheskoi srede: sb. statei [Man in sociophysical environment: Collection of articles]. Ed. by Kh. Liimets et al. Tallinn: Tallinna Pedagoogiline Instituut, 1983. 188 p.
  3. Ikonnikov A.V. In search of ways to a humanized environment. In: Lynch K. Obraz goroda [Image of the City]. Translated from English by V.L. Glazychev; ed. by A.V. Ikonnikov. Moscow: Stroiizdat, 1982. 328 p.
  4. Pochtovaya A.V. The current state of the urban environment: Basic concepts, problems and features of management. Voprosy ekonomiki i upravleniya=Economics and Management, 2017, no. 4 (11). Available at: https://moluch.ru/th/5/archive/73/2782/ (accessed: 24.11.2019) (in Russian).
  5. Kasatkina S.S. Everyday life of cities in the European North of Russia: Philosophical understanding of development issues. In: Istoricheskaya urbanistika: proshloe i nastoyashchee goroda: sb. nauch. st. Vseros. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem, g. Surgut, SurGU, 14 noyabrya 2014 goda [Historical urban studies: The past and the present of the city: Collection of scientific articles following the All-Russian conference with international participation, Surgut, SurSU, November 14, 2014]. Ed. by I.N. Stas' et al. Kurgan: Kurganskii Dom pechati, 2015. 819 p.
  6. Vysokovsky A. Bor'ba za gorozhanina: chelovecheskii potentsial i gorodskaya sreda [Struggle for the Citizen: Human Potential and the Urban Environment]. Higher School of Urbanism, National Research University Higher School of Economics. Available at: http://docplayer.ru/380260-Borba-za-gorozhanina.html (accessed: 22.11.2019).
  7. Chernova E.B. Sociological justification of strategy of territorial development: Methodological and practical aspects. Regional'naya ekonomika. Yug Rossii=Regional Economy. South of Russia, 2017, no. 1 (15), pp. 36–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2017.1.4 (in Russian).
  8. Habermas J. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deistvie [Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action]. Translated from German by D.V. Sklyadneva, afterword by B.V. Markova. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2000. 380 p.
  9. Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Lifeworld and System: a Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by T. McCarthy. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press, 1987. 457 p.
  10. Burkart R. On Jürgen Habermas and public relations. Public Relations Review, 2007, vol. 33, iss. 3, pp. 249–254.
  11. Yiftachel O., Huxley M. Debating dominance and relevance: Notes on the «communicative turn» in planning theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2000, no. 24 (4), pp. 907–913.
  12. Mattila H. Public participation and legitimacy management in planning: A Habermasian Perspective to Finnish Welfarist Planning Tradition. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 2018, vol. 100, iss. 4, pp. 309–328.
  13. Brige G. Reason in the City? Communicative action, media and urban politic. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2009, vol. 33.1, pp. 237–240.
  14. Burstrom von Malmborg F. Environmental management systems, communicative action and organizational learning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2002, no. 11, pp. 312–323.
  15. Steinberg F. Can development communication improve urban management? Habitat International, 1996, vol. 20, iss. 4, pp. 567–581.
  16. Kataeva Yu.V. Asymmetry of the interests of the urban environment transformation subjects as a factor of its unbalanced development. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika=Perm University Herald. Economy, 2013, no. 3 (18), pp. 129–137. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/asimmetriya-interesov-subektov-preobrazovaniya-gorodskoy-sredy-kak-faktor-ee-nesbalansirovannogo-razvitiya (accessed: 12.04.2020) (in Russian).
  17. Zhelnina A.A., Tykanova E.V. Formal and Informal civic infrastructure: Contemporary studies of urban local activism in Russia. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii=Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2019, no. 22 (1), pp. 162–192 (in Russian).
  18. Glukhova A.V., Kol'ba A.I., Sokolov A.V. Political-institutional and communicative aspects of interaction of subject of urban conflicts (based on expert survey). Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie=Human. Community. Management, 2017, no. 18 (4), pp. 44–65 (in Russian).
  19. Tykanova E.V., Khokhlova A.M. Interaction configuration of St. Petersburg social movements organizations aimed at improving the urban environment quality. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 2019, no. 5 (22), pp. 2–17 (in Russian).
  20. Shevtsova I.K., Bederson V.D. “Authorities’ point of view is to keep silence”: Interaction of initiative groups and local authorities in the urban planning policy. Politicheskaya nauka=Political Science (RU), 2017, no. 4, pp. 111–136 (in Russian).
  21. Afzalan N., Sanchez Th.W., Evans-Cowley J. Cities. The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 2017, no. 67, pp. 21–30.
  22. Evans-Cowley J. Planning in the real-time city: the future of mobile technology. Journal of Planning Literature, 2010, no. 25 (2), pp. 136–149.
  23. Odendaal N. Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2003, no. 27, pp. 585–607.
  24. Dridze T.M. Ecoanthropocentric model of social cognition as a way to overcome the paradigmatic crisis in sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 2000, no. 2, pp. 20–28 (in Russian).
  25. Nikovskaya L.I., Skalaban I.A. Civic participation: Features of discourse and actual trends of development. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya=Polis. Political Studies, 2017, no. 6, pp. 43–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.06.04 (in Russian)

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article