RuEn

рубрика "Зарубежный опыт"

Университеты в переходный период: модель «6i» для стратегического управления

Каро-Гонсалес А., Феррейра-Лопес Л.

Том 13, №1, 2020

Каро-Гонсалес А., Феррейра-Лопес Л. Университеты в переходный период: модель «6i» для стратегического управления // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2020. Т. 13. № 1. С. 217–230. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.1.67.13

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.1.67.13

  1. Hansson S., Polk M. Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact. Research Evaluation, 2018, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 132–144. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/rev/article/27/2/132/4855909 (accessed October 29, 2018)
  2. Martin B. Are universities and university research under threat? Towards an evolutionary model of university speciation. Cambridge J Econ, 2012, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 543–565. Available at: http://web.a.ebscohost.com.proxy-oceano.deusto.es/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=e2d60e4d-d2ad-4ac9-8b0c-d2064d9eebc3%40sdc-v-sessmgr03 (accessed December 17, 2018)
  3. Thoenig J.-C., Paradeise C. Strategic capacity and organisational capabilities: a challenge for universities. Minerva, 2016, no. 54, pp. 293–324. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11024-016-9297-6.pdf (accessed May 27, 2019)
  4. Caro-Gonzalez A. The “6i Research Model”: Evolution of an innovative institutional STI policy framework at the University of Deusto. fteval J Res Technol Policy Eval, 2019, no. 48, pp.105–113.
  5. Akkerman S.F., Bakker A. Boundary crossing and boundary objects.  Review of Educational Research, 2011, no 81 (2), pp. 132–169. Available at: http://rer.aera.net (accessed February 7, 2019)
  6. Engeström Y. Learning by Expanding: an Activity-Theorical Perspective. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy, 1987.
  7. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning as a social system. Syst Thinker, 1998, no. 9 (5), pp. 2–3.
  8. Akkerman S.F., Bakker A. Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 2011, no. 81 (2), pp. 132–169.
  9. Woldegiyorgis A.A., Proctor D., De Wit H. Internationalization of research: key considerations and concerns. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2018, no. 22 (2), pp. 161–176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318762804 (accessed February 11, 2019)
  10. Abramo G., Andrea C.D., Solazzi M. The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 2011, no. 86, pp. 629–643. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11192-010-0284-7.pdf (accessed February 28, 2019)
  11. Oleksiyenko A. Global portfolios and strategic international partnerships of a major research university. Library and Archives Canada=Bibliothèque et Archives Canada, 2009. Available at: https://oceano.biblioteca.deusto.es/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest304342683&context=PC&vid=deusto&lang=es_ES&search_scope=default_scope&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,Global portfolios and strategic inter (accessed May 9, 2019).
  12. Burgess M., Garnett V., O’Connor A., Ohlmeyer J. Interdisciplinarity for Impact – Workshop Report. Dublin, 2016. Available at: https://www.tcd.ie/trinitylongroomhub/assets/documents/2018-FinalReport.pdf (accessed April 1, 2019).
  13. Kwiek M. The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 2016, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 379–397. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10734-015-9910-x (accessed March 11, 2019)
  14. Mårtensson P., Fors U., Wallin S.-B., Zander U., Nilsson G.H. Evaluating research: a multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice and quality. Research Policy, 2016, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 593–603. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733315001845 (accessed November 15, 2018)
  15. Miettinen R., Tuunainen J., Esko T. Epistemological, artefactual and interactional–institutional foundations of social impact of academic research. Minerva, 2015, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 257–277. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11024-015-9278-1 (accessed May 27, 2019)
  16. Quantifying the social impact of research and medical journals. Lancet, 2014, vol. 384, no. 9943, p. 557. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673614613490 (accessed October 1, 2018)

Полная версия статьи

-->