07.12.202412.2024с 01.01.2024
Просмотры
Посетители
* - в среднем в день за текущий месяц
RuEn

рубрика "Пространственные аспекты территориального развития"

Влияние торговых мегаформатов в АТР на российский экспорт

Изотов Д.А.

Том 14, №1, 2021

Изотов Д.А. Влияние торговых мегаформатов в АТР на российский экспорт // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2021. Т. 14. № 1. С. 41–55. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.4

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.4

  1. Baldwin R. A Domino Theory of Regionalism. NBER Working Paper 4465, September 1993. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w4465.pdf (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  2. Baldwin R. The world trade organization and the future of multilateralism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2016, vol. 30, pp. 95–116. DOI: 10.1257/jep.30.1.95
  3. Rodrik D. What do trade agreements really do? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018, vol. 32, pp. 73–90. DOI: 10.1257/jep.32.2.73
  4. Fergusson I.F., McMinimy M.A., Williams B.R. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): In Brief. Congressional research service, 2016, February. Available at: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R44278.pdf (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  5. Kuwayama M. TPP11 (CPTPP): Its Implications for Japan - Latin America Trade Relations in Times of Uncertainty. Research Institute for economics and business (RIEB) of Kobe University, DP2019-05, 2019, March 25. Available at: https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2019-05.pdf (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  6. Кадочников П., Кнобель А., Синельников-Мурылев С. Открытость российской экономики как источник экономического роста // Вопросы экономики. 2016. № 12. С. 26–42. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2016-12-26-42
  7. Nilsson L. Reflections on the economic modelling of free trade agreements. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 2018, vol. 3, pp. 156–186. DOI: 10.21642/JGEA.030104AF
  8. Chemingui M., Surry Y., Thabet C. Tools for Ex Ante Trade Impact Analysis. Economic and social commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), United Nations, Beirut, 2018. Available at: https://www.unescwa.org/file/85059/download?token=QDIA4INk (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  9. Cheong D. Methods for Ex Ante Economic Evaluation of Free Trade Agreements. Asian development bank. Working Paper, 2010, no. 52, June. Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28526/wp52-ex-ante-economic-evaluation.pdf (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  10. Кнобель А., Седалищев В. Риски и выгоды для ЕАЭС от различных сценариев интеграции в Азиатско-Тихоокеанском регионе // Экономическая политика. 2017. Т. 12. № 2. С. 72–85. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2017-2-03
  11. Кнобель А.Ю. Евразийский экономический союз: перспективы развития и возможные препятствия // Вопросы экономики. 2015. № 3. С. 87–108. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2015-3-87-108
  12. Petri P.A., Plummer M.G. The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates. Peterson institute for international economics working paper, no. 16-2, East-West Center Workshop on Mega-Regionalism – New Challenges for Trade and Innovation, 2016. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2723413
  13. Kawasaki K. The relative significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific. Journal of Asian Economics, 2015, vol. 39, pp. 19–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2015.05.001.
  14. Malokostov A., Turdyeva N. Impacts of Trade ‘Meta-Agreements’ on Russia. The Impact of Mega-Agreements on BRICS. 5th BRICS Trade and economic research network (TERN) Meeting, 2014. pp. 50–62. Available at: https://ccgi.fgv.br/sites/ccgi.fgv.br/files/file/Publicacoes/5th%20BRICS-TERN%20ebook.pdf (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  15. Izotov D. Russia and the Pacific Rim: prospects for trade liberalization. Russian Politics and Law, 2017, vol. 55, pp. 457–479. DOI: 10.1080/10611940.2017.1574502
  16. Izotov D.A. Liberalization of Russia’s trade with the European Union, BRICS, and Trans-Pacific partnership countries. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2017, vol. 28, pp. 338–345. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700717030078
  17. Li Ch., Lin X., Whalley J. Comparing Alternative China and US Arrangements with CPTPP. NBER Working Paper 26877. 2020, march. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w26877 (дата обращения: 20.12.2020).
  18. Petri P.A., Plummer M.G., Zhai F. The TPP, China and the FTAAP: The Case for Convergence. New Directions in Asia-Pacific Economic Integration. Ed. by G. Tang, P.A. Petri. Honolulu: East-West Center, 2014, pp. 78–89. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2438725
  19. Ferrantino M.J., Maliszewska M., Taran S. Actual and Potential Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific: Estimated Effects. World Bank, Washington, DC, 2019. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33549 (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  20. Laird S., Yeats A. The UNCTAD Trade Policy Simulation Model. A Note on the Methodology, Data and Uses. United Nations conference on trade and development, Geneva, 1986, October. Available at: https://wits.worldbank.org/data/public/SMARTMethodology.pdf (дата обращения: 20.12.2020).
  21. Francois J., Hall K.H. Partial Equilibrium Modeling. Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis: A Handbook. Ed. by J.F. Francois, K.A. Reinert. Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 122–155. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139174824.007
  22. Armington P. A Theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. Internationally Monetary Fund Staff Paper, 1969, vol. 16, pp. 159–176. DOI: 10.2307/3866403
  23. Viner J. The Customs Union Issue. Oxford University Press, 2014, 256 p.
  24. Изотов Д.А. Экономическая интеграция России со странами АТР: проблемы и перспективы / под общ. ред. П.А. Минакира; Институт экономических исследований Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук. Хабаровск: ИЭИ ДВО РАН, 2020. 368 с.
  25. Francois J., Hall K.H. Global Simulation Analysis of Industry-Level Trade Policy: the GSIM model. IIDE Discussion Papers 20090803, institute for international and development economics, 2009. Available at: http://www.i4ide.org/content/wpaper/dp20090803.zip (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  26. Feenstra R.C., Luck P.A., Obstfeld M., Russ K.N. In Search of the Armington Elasticity. National bureau of economic research, working paper series 20063. April 2014. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w20063 (дата обращения: 20.12.2020).
  27. Stawowy W. Calculation of Ad Valorem Equivalents of Non-Ad Valorem Tariffs. Methodology Notes. UNCTAD, 2001, October. Available at: http://wits.worldbank.org/witsweb/download/docs/AVEmeth.doc. (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  28. Incidence of Non-Ad Valorem Tariffs in Members' Tariff Schedules and Possible Approaches to the Estimation of Ad Valorem Equivalents. World Trade Organization, negotiating group on market access, 2003, May. Available at: http://wits.worldbank.org/wits/docs/wto_s10.doc. (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  29. Jammes O., Olarrega M. Explaining SMART and GSIM. The World Bank, 2005, April. Available at: http://wits.worldbank.org/witsweb/download/ docs/explaining_smart_and_gsim.pdf (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  30. Wei S., Frankel J.A. Open versus closed trade blocs. Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements. University of Chicago Press, 1997. Рp. 119–140. Available at: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c859 (дата обращения 20.12.2020).
  31. Bagwell K., Staiger R.W. The Design of Trade Agreements. National bureau of economic research working paper 22087, 2016, March. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w22087 (дата обращения 20.12.2020).

Полная версия статьи