Каро-Гонсалес А., Вальехо О., Альбала Х. (2025). Восстановительные преобразования на перепутье: опыт использования «живых лабораторий» // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. Т. 18. № 4. С. 250–267. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2025.4.100.14
Betsill M.M., Bulkeley H. (2021). Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change. In: Mills K., Stiles K. (Eds). Understanding Global Cooperation. Twenty-Five Years of Research on Global Governance. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004462601_014
Bhatta A., Vreugdenhil H., Slinger J. (2023). Characterizing nature-based living labs from their seeds in the past. Environmental Development, 49(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100959
Busquets J. (2010). Orchestrating Smart Business Network dynamics for innovation. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(4), 481–493. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.19
Caro-González A. et al. (2023b). The Three MoskEUteers. Pushing and pursuing a “One for all, All for one” triple transition: Social, green and digital. In: Facilitation in Complexity: from Creation to Co-creation, from Dreaming to Co-dreaming, from Evolution to Co-evolution. (Contributions to Management Science). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11065-8 (accessed: June 8, 2023).
Caro-González A. (2023a). Transformative Governance for the Future. Navigating Profound Transitions. SpringerBriefs in Business. Available at: https://eohforgood.com/eoh-for-good-book/
Costero Bolaños J.F. (2024). Urban agenda and metropolitan governance in Pamplona: Lessons from a multi-level and multi-actor process. In: Socio-Spatial Dynamics in Mediterranean Europe. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55436-0_19
Degroot D. et al. (2021). Towards a rigorous understanding of societal responses to climate change. Nature, 591(7851), 539–550. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03190-2
Delgado-Jiménez A. (2024). Informal placemaking and energy transition: A review of trends on community-led energy initiatives for social justice. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 17(2), 321–336. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2024.2326860
Di Gregorio M. et al. (2019). Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Global Environmental Change, 54, 64–77. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003
Engels F., Wentland A., Pfotenhauer S.M. (2019). Testing future societies? Developing a framework for test beds and living labs as instruments of innovation governance. Research Policy, 48(9), 103826. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103826
Fuhr H., Hickmann T., Kern K. (2018). The role of cities in multi-level climate governance: local climate policies and the 1.5°C target. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 30, 1–6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.10.006
Gonzales-Iwanciw J., Dewulf A., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen S. (2020). Learning in multi-level governance of adaptation to climate change – a literature review. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(5), 779–797. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1594725
Heinen D., Arlati A., Knieling J. (2022). Five dimensions of climate governance: A framework for empirical research based on polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(1), 56–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1963
Iandolo F. et al. (2024). Stakeholder engagement in managing systemic risk management. Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12694.
Kern K. (2019). Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance: Embedded upscaling of local experiments in Europe. Environmental Politics, 28(1), 125–145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1521979
Leminen S., Rajahonka M., Westerlund M. (2017). Towards third-generation living lab networks in cities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7, 21–35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1118
Matus M. et al. (2018). Cultura, diseño y tecnología: Ensayos de tecnoantropología. El Colegio de la Frontera Norte (COLEF), Tijuana, Mexico. Available at: https://livinglabing.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Cultura-disen%CC%83o-y-tecnologi%CC%81a-Lectura.pdf
Mccormick K., Hartmann C. (2017). The Emerging Landscape of Urban Living Labs: Characteristics, Practices and Examples. Lund University.
Prats J.O. (2019). The Governance of Public– Private Partnerships: A Comparative Analysis. IDB: Inter-American Development Bank. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0001575
Puerari E. et al. (2018). Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability, 10(6), 1893. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061893
Rodriguez Müller P. et al. (2024). Synergies of Territorial Innovation and Digital Transformation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: 10.2760/680158
Scholl C., de Kraker J., Dijk M. (2022). Enhancing the contribution of urban living labs to sustainability transformations: Towards a meta-lab approach. Urban Transformations, 4(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00038-4
Schuurman D., Marez L., Ballon P. (2016). The impact of living lab methodology on open innovation contributions and outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1, 7–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956
Serra A., Caro-González A., Colobrans J. (2024). Collaboratories: Designing universal innovation ecosystems in the era of transitions. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 19(1), 101–114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v19i1
Seto K.C. et al. (2021). From low- to net-zero carbon cities: The next global agenda. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 377–415. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-050120-113117
Shabnam H. et al. (2016). Impact of T-shaped skill and top management support on innovation speed; the moderating role of technology uncertainty. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1153768
Shukla P.R. et al. (Eds.) (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
Smith P. et al. (2020). Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification? Global Change Biology, 26(3), 1532–1575. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14878
Voytenko Y., McCormick K., Evans J., Schliwa G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 45–54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
Vrontis D. et al. (2020). Integrated thinking rolls! Stakeholder engagement actions translate integrated thinking into practice. Meditari Accountancy Research [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0654