Научный журнал ВолНЦ РАН (печатное издание)
22.11.202411.2024с 01.01.2024
Просмотры
Посетители
* - в среднем в день за текущий месяц
RuEn

рубрика "Социальное и экономическое развитие"

Особенности цифрового гражданского участия в ракурсе современных исследований

Смолева Е.О., Попов А.В.

Том 15, №3, 2022

Смолева Е.О., Попов А.В. (2022). Особенности цифрового гражданского участия в ракурсе современных исследований // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. Т. 15. № 3. С. 154–166. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.8

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.8

Аннотация   |   Авторы   |   Список литературы
  1. Ахременко А.С., Стукал Д.К., Петров А.П. (2020). Сеть или текст? Факторы распространения протеста в социальных медиа: теория и анализ данных // Полис. Политические исследования. № 2. С. 73–91. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.02.06
  2. Башева О.А. (2020). Цифровой активизм как новый метод гражданской мобилизации // Научный результат. Социология и управление. Т. 6. № 1. С. 41–57. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-1-0-4
  3. Демакова К., Маковецкая С., Скрякова Е. (2014). Неполитический активизм в России // Pro et Contra. № 3–4. С. 148–163.
  4. Ермолаева П.О., Ермолаева Ю.В., Башева О.А. (2020). Цифровой экологический активизм как новая форма экологического участия населения // Социологическое обозрение. Т. 19. № 3. С. 376–408. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-376-408(388)
  5. Макарова Е.А., Макарова Е.Л., Махрина Е.А. (2016). Психологические особенности кибербуллинга как формы интернет-преступления // Российский психологический журнал. № 13 (3). С. 293–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2016.3.17(298-299)
  6. Никовская Л.И. (2017). Гражданский активизм и публичная политика в России: состояние и вызовы // Государство и граждане в электронной среде. Вып. I (Труды XX Международной объединенной научной конференции Интернет и современное общество, IMS-2017, Санкт-Петербург, 21–23 июня 2017 г. Сборник научных статей). СПб.: Университет ИТМО. С. 144–158.
  7. Скалабан И.А. (2011a). Общественное участие: теоретико-методологические проблемы интерпретации // Современные исследования социальных проблем. Т. 6. № 2. С. 216–220.
  8. Скалабан И.А. (2011b). Социальное, общественное и гражданское участие: к проблеме осмысления понятий // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Серия «Философия. Социология. Политология». № 1 (13). С. 131–139.
  9. Смолева Е.О. (2021). Интернет-практики участия граждан в создании комфортной городской среды (на материалах Северо-Западного федерального округа) // Проблемы развития территории. Т. 25. № 2. С. 90–107. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2021.2.112.6
  10. Al-Hasan A., Khalil O., Yim D. (2021). Digital information diversity and political engagement: The impact of website characteristics on browsing behavior and voting participation. Information Polity, 26(1), 21–37. DOI: 10.3233/IP-190183
  11. Barua Z., Barua S., Aktar S., Kabir N., Li M. (2020). Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 2020, 8. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061720300569 (accessed: October 10, 2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119
  12. Bennett L.W. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20–39. DOI: 10.1177/0002716212451428
  13. Bennett L.W., Segerberg A. (2015). The logic of connective action. Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
  14. Boulianne S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211. DOI: 10.1080/10584600902854363
  15. Boulianne S., Theocharis Y. (2020). Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127. DOI: 10.1177/0894439318814190
  16. Bovet A., Makse H.A. (2019). Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nature Communications, 10. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07761-2 (accessed: October 10, 2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2
  17. Boyd D. (2008). Facebook’s privacy trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14, 13–20.
  18. Edgerly S., Vraga E.K., Bode L., Thorson K., Thorson E. (2018). New media, new relationship to participation? A closer look at youth news repertoires and political participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 192–212. DOI: 10.1177/1077699017706928
  19. Enikolopov R., Makarin A., Petrova M., Polishchuk L. (2020). Social image, networks, and protest participation. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2940171
  20. Etzioni A., Etzioni O. (1999). Face-to-face and computer-mediated communities, a comparative analysis. The Information Society, 15(4), 241–248. DOI: 10.1080/019722499128402
  21. Eubank N., Grossman G., Platas M.R., Rodden J. (2021) Viral voting: Social networks and political participation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 16(3), 265–284. DOI:10.1561/100.00019092
  22. Fergusson L., Molina C. (2021). Facebook Causes Protests. Lacea Working Paper Series No. 0041.l. 112 р.
  23. Gerbaudo P. (2017). From cyper-autonomism to cyber-populism: an ideological history of digital activism. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15(2), 477–489. DOI: 10.31269/triplec.v15i2.773
  24. Gunitsky S. (2015). Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability. Perspect. Polit., 13(1), 42–54.
  25. Hjalmar B.C., Jonas T., Benedikte B. (2021). On solidarity and volunteering during the COVID-19 crisis in Denmark: The impact of social networks and social media groups on the distribution of support. European Societies, 23(1),122–140. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1818270
  26. Howard P.N., Duffy A., Freelon D., Hussain M., Mari W., Mazaid M. (2011). What Was the Role of Social Media During the Arab Spring? PITPI Work. Pap. 30 p.
  27. Howard P.N., Savage S., Flores Saviaga C., Toxtli C., Monroy-Hernández A. (2016). Social media, civic engagement, and the slacktivism hypothesis: Lessons from Mexico’s “El Bronco”. Journal of International Affairs, 70(1), 55–74.
  28. Jost J.T., Barber P., Bonneau R., Langer M., Metzger M., Nagler J., Sterling J., Tucker J.A. (2018). How social media facilitates political protest: Information, motivation, and social networks. Political Psychology, 39, 85–118. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12478
  29. Khondker H.H. (2011). Role of the new media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations, 8(5), 675–679. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2011.621287
  30. Kristofferson K., White K., Peloza J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149–1166. DOI: 10.1086/674137
  31. Lane D.S., Lee S.S., Liang F., Kim D.H., Shen L., Weeks B.E., Kwak N. (2019). Social media expression and the political self. Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49–72. DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqy064
  32. Lane D.S., Dal Cin S. (2018). Sharing beyond slacktivism: The effect of socially observable prosocial media sharing on subsequent offline helping behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1523–1540. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340496
  33. Lee Y.-H., Hsieh G. (2013). Does slacktivism hurt activism? the effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York. DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2470770
  34. Lonkila M., Shpakovskaya L., Torchinsky P. (2021). Digital activism in Russia: The Evolution and forms of online participation in an authoritarian state. In: Gritsenko D., Wijermars M., Kopotev M. (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6_8
  35. Mandarano L., Meenar M., Steins C. (2010). Building social capital in the digital age of civic engagement. Journal of Planning Literature, 25(2), 123–135. DOI: 10.1177/0885412210394102 (132)
  36. Menteş S.A. (2019). Online environmental activism: The case of Iğneada floodplain forest. SAGE Open, 9, 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/2158244019877877
  37. Micheletti M. (2003). Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism and Collective Action. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  38. Milbrath L. (1965). Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  39. Norris P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press. 303 р.
  40. Pettingill L. (2008). Engagement 2.0? How the new digital media can invigorate civic engagement. Gnovis Journal, 8(3), 155–161.
  41. Putnam R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  42. Rottinghaus B., Escher T. (2020). Mechanisms for inclusion and exclusion through digital political participation: Evidence from a comparative study of online consultations in three German cities. Z Politikwiss, 30, 261–298. DOI: 10.1007/s41358-020-00222-7
  43. Seddighi H., Salmani I. (2018) Online volunteering, a way to reduce health inequalities: A review study. Journal of Community Health Research, 7(4), 256–264.
  44. Silva F., Proença T., Ferreira M.R. (2018). Volunteers’ perspective on online volunteering – a qualitative approach. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15, 531–552. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-018-0212-8
  45. Smith B.G., Krishna A., Al-Sinan R. (2019). Beyond slacktivism: Examining the entanglement between social media engagement, empowerment, and participation in activism. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(3), 182–196. DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2019.1621870
  46. Teocharis Y. (2015). The conceptualization of digitally networked participation. Social Media Society, 2(1), 5. DOI: 10.1177/2056305115610140
  47. Theocharis Y., de Moor J., van Deth J.W. (2021). Digitally networked participation and lifestyle politics as new modes of political participation. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 30–53. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.231
  48. Tranfield D., Denyer D., Smart P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 4, 207–222.
  49. Vegh S. (2003). Classifying forms of online activism: The case of cyberprotests against the World Bank. In: McCaughey M., Ayers M. (Eds.). Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
  50. Weber L., Loumakis A., Bergman J. (2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 26–42.
  51. Wolfsfeld G., Segev E., Sheafer T. (2013). Social media and the Arab Spring: Politics comes first. Int. J. Press., 18(2), 115–137.
  52. Wu W., Weaver D. (1997). On-line democracy or on-line demagoguery? Public opinion “polls” on the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2 (4), 71–86.
  53. Xenos M., Vromen A., Loader B.D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
  54. Yang K.C., Kang Y. (2017). Social media, political mobilization, and citizen engagement: A case study of the March 18, 2014, Sunflower Student Movement. In: Adria M., Mao Y. (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Citizen Engagement and Public Participation in the Era of New Media. IGI Global. Available at: http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1081-9.ch020
  55. Yessenbekova U.M. (2020). Social media and slacktivism in young people’s life. Media Watch, 11(3), 515–525.

Полная версия статьи