RuEn

Journal section "Theoretical and methodological issues"

Efficiency of State Policy in the Field of Science and Technology in the Russian Federation: Assessment Methodology and Approbation Results

Vasilyeva I.N., Rozova O.I., Korneeva N.D., Bogatova R.S.

Volume 16, Issue 6, 2023

Vasilyeva I.N., Rozova O.I., Korneeva N.D., Bogatova R.S. (2023). Effectiveness of state policy in the field of science and technology in the Russian Federation: Assessment methodology and approbation results. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(6), 155–173. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.6.90.9

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.6.90.9

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Bach L. et al. (1995). Evaluation of the economic effects of Brite-Euram programmes on the European industry. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/BF02018003
  2. Barré R. (2001). Policy-making processes and evaluation tools: S&T indicators. In: Science and Technology Policy. Vol. II. Policy-Making Processes and Evaluation Tools: S&T Indicators. Available at: http://eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C15/E1-30-04-01.pdf (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  3. Bloch C. (2007). Assessing recent developments in innovation measurement: The third edition of the Oslo Manual. Science and Public Policy, 34(1), 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X190487
  4. Breusova A.G. (2015). Evaluation of the effectiveness of state programs. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika=Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics”, 2, 128–136 (in Russian).
  5. Caetano I. (2017). Innovation, Evaluation and Measurement: Macro-Level and Firm-Level Perspectives. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-55577-9_7
  6. Dmitrenko M.A. (2018). Features of scientific and technical policy in Russia. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski=State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes, 2, 227–231. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2018-1-2-227-231 (in Russian).
  7. Gokhberg L.M., Gershman M.A., Lapochkina V.V. et al. (2023). Delaem nauku v Rossii: reiting mer nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politiki [Doing Science in Russia: Rating of Science and Technology Policy Measures]. NIU VSHE. Available at: https://issek.hse.ru/news/page2.html (accessed: September 13, 2023).
  8. Kuhlmann S. (1996). Evaluation as a Medium of Science & Technology Policy: Recent Developments in Germany and Beyond. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/1823592.pdf (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  9. Kuhlmann S. (2003). Evaluation of research and innovation policies: A discussion of trends with examples from Germany. Journal of Technology Management, 26(2-4), 131–49. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stefan-Kuhlmann/publication/46671429_Evaluation_of_research_and_innovation_policies_A_discussion_of_trends_with_examples_from_Germany/links/0c96051ed410f21139000000/Evaluation-of-research-and-innovation-policies-A-discussion-of-trends-with-examples-from-Germany.pdf (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  10. Lepori B., Reale E. (2012). S&T indicators as a tool for formative evaluation of research programs. Evaluation, 18(4), 451–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012460961
  11. Luo L.P. (2012). A review of the Chinese National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation (JMDE: 3), 197–199. Available at: https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/111/126 (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  12. Luukkonen T. (1997). The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programs. Research Policy, 27(6), 599–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00058-4
  13. Malinetskii G.G. (2021). Science and development strategy of Russia. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie=Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 3, 26–44. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2021.3.2. EDN XFIPED (in Russian).
  14. Onishchenko G.G., Kablov E.N., Ivanov V.V. (2022). Scientific and technological development of Russia in the context of achieving national goals: Problems and solutions. Innovatsii=Innovations, 6(260), 3–16. DOI: 10.26310/2071-3010.2020.260.6.001 (in Russian).
  15. Rykova I.N. (2013). Approaches to determining the performance of research and development activities in Russia. Finansovyi zhurnal=Financial Journal, 3(17), 73–88 (in Russian).
  16. Sanz Menéndez L. at al. (1997). Science and Technology Policy Evaluation in the Context of Advanced S&T Policy Planning. Available at: https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/2038/1/science_technology.pdf (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  17. Sanz Menéndez L. at al. (2005). Explaining the science and technology policies of regional governments. In: Serie Documentos de Trabajo, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (CSIC), 10-2005. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/1644 (accessed: September 14, 2023).
  18. Tanaka K., Sakata I. (2017). New Science and Technology Policy Evaluation Using Bibliometric Approach. DOI: 10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125259
  19. Tulyakova I.V. (2017). Assessing the efficiency of government programs: problems and prospects. Finkontrol’, 4. Available at: https://rufincontrol.ru/online/article/332551/(accessed: September 14, 2023; in Russian).
  20. Vasilyeva I.N., Kris’ko M.O., Korneeva N.D. et al. (2022). The relevance of the tools and mechanisms created during the implementation of the action plan of the strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian federation and the impact of the proposed measures on the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii=Sociology of Science and Tchnology, 13(3), 118–142. DOI: 10.24412/2079-0910-2022-3-118-142 (in Russian).

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article