VolRC RAS scientific journal
RuEn

Journal section "Social and economic development"

The Impact of Precarization on the Standard of Living and Employment Situation of Russian Youth

Popov A.V.

Volume 16, Issue 6, 2023

Popov A.V. (2023). The impact of precarization on the standard of living and the employment situation of Russian youth. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(6), 236–251. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.6.90.14

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.6.90.14

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Bessant J., Farthing R., Watts B. (2017). The Precarious Generation. A Political Economy of Young People. London: Routledge.
  2. Bobkov V.N. (Ed.). (2019). Neustoichivaya zanyatost’ v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: teoriya i metodologiya vyyavleniya, otsenivanie i vektor sokrashcheniya [Unsustainable Employment in the Russian Federation: Theory and Methodology of Identification, Estimation and Vector of Reduction]. Moscow: KnoRus.
  3. Bobkov V.N., Litvinyuk A.A. (Eds.). (2016). Rossiiskaya molodezh’ na rynke truda: ekonomicheskaya aktivnost’ i problemy trudoustroistva v megapolise [Russian Youth in the Labor Market: Economic Activity and Employment Problems in the Megacity]. Moscow: RUSAINS.
  4. Bobkov V.N., Loktyukhina N.V., Shamaeva E.F. (Eds.). (2022). Uroven’ i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya Rossii: ot real’nosti k proektirovaniyu budushchego [Living Standards and Quality of Life of the Russian Population: From Reality to Projecting the Future]. Moscow: FNISTs RAN
  5. Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Popov A.V. et al. (2023). Vliyanie prekarizatsii na kachestvo zanyatosti i uroven’ zhizni pokolennykh grupp ekonomicheski aktivnogo naseleniya [Impact of Precarization on the Quality of Employment and Living Standards of Generational Groups of the Economically Active Population]. Izhevsk: Shelest.
  6. Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Ivanova T.V. et al. (2022a). Significant indicators of precarious employment and their priority. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 18(4), 502–520. DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.7 (in Russian).
  7. Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Shichkin I.A. (2022b). The impact of professional skills in the use of information and communication technologies on the income from employment: Generational differentiation. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal=Russian Economic Journal, 4, 93–113. DOI: 10.33983/0130-9757-2022-4-93-113 (in Russian).
  8. Bohle P., Quinlan M., Kennedy D. et al. (2004). Working hours, work-life conflict and health in precarious and “permanent” employment. Revista de saude publica, 38, 19–25. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102004000700004
  9. Bone K.D. (2019). “I don’t want to be a vagrant for the rest of my life”: Young peoples’ experiences of precarious work as a “continuous present”. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(9), 1218–1237. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2019.1570097
  10. Cassells R., Duncan A., Mavisakalyan A. et al. (2018). Future of Work in Australia. Preparing for Tomorrow’s World. Perth: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre.
  11. Chan S., Tweedie D. (2015). Precarious work and reproductive insecurity. Social Alternatives, 34(4), 8–13.
  12. Choonara J. (2020). The precarious concept of precarity. Review of Radical Political Economics, 52(3), 427–446. DOI: 10.1177/0486613420920427
  13. Cranford C.J., Vosko L.F., Zukewich N. (2003). Precarious employment in the Canadian labour market: A statistical portrait. Just Labour, 3. DOI: 10.25071/1705-1436.164
  14. Gasper D. (2007). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualizations. In: McGillivray M. (Ed.) Human Well-Being. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI: 10.1057/9780230625600_2
  15. Giltman M.A., Merzlyakova A.Yu., Antosik L.V. (2022). Exit from registered unemployment: Estimating the impact of individual characteristics. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya=Public Administration Issues, 1, 193–219. DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-1-193-219 (in Russian).
  16. Jetha A., Martin Ginis K.A., Ibrahim S. et al. (2020). The working disadvantaged: The role of age, job tenure and disability in pre-carious work. BMC Public Health, 20. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09938-1
  17. Khusainov B., Alzhanova F. (2017). Employment precarization as a global challenge: Measuring and assessing the impact on Kazakhstan’s development. Kazakhskii ekonomicheskii vestnik=Kazakh Economic Review, 2(28), 2–13 (in Russian).
  18. Kuchenkova A.V. (2022). Employment precarization and the subjective well-being of employees in different age groups. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal=Sociological Journal, 28(1), 101–120. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2022.28.1.8840 (in Russian).
  19. Kuchenkova A.V., Kolosova E.A. (2018). Differentiation of workers by features of precarious employment. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 3, 288–305. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.15 (in Russian).
  20. Kurennoy A.M. (2022). The need for urgent creation new Labour Code: Idea fix? Ezhegodnik trudovogo prava=Russian Journal of Labour & Law, 10, 40–52 (in Russian).
  21. Lodovici M.S., Semenza R. (Eds.). (2012). Precarious Work and High-Skilled Youth in Europe. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
  22. Melges F., Calarge T.C.C., Benini E.G. et al. (2022). The new precarization of work: A conceptual map. Organ. Soc., 29(103), 638–666. DOI: 10.1590/1984-92302022v29n0032en
  23. Miguel Carmo R., Cantante F., de Almeida Alves N. (2014). Time projections: Youth and precarious employment. Time & Society, 23(3), 337–357. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X14549505
  24. Mrozowicki A., Trappmann V. (2021). Precarity as a biographical problem? Young workers living with precarity in Germany and Poland. Work, Employment and Society, 35(2), 221–238. DOI: 10.1177/0950017020936898
  25. Odegov Yu.G., Babynina L.S. (2018). Precarious employment as a possible factor behind the use of youth labor force potential in Russia. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 4, 386–409. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.20 (in Russian).
  26. Popov A.V., Soloveva T.S. (2020). Employment precarization: An analysis of academic discourse on the essence and ways of measuring. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 9, 103–113. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009618-2 (in Russian).
  27. Popov A.V., Soloveva T.S. (2023). Employment prospects for the population of Russia along the center-periphery axis (the case of Vologda Region). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 8, 47–59. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250027366-5 (in Russian).
  28. Shehu E., Nilsson B. (2014). Informal Employment among Youth: Evidence from 20 School-to-Work Transition Surveys. Geneva: ILO.
  29. Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskiy V.V., Gasiukova E.N. (2015). Precariat: Theory and empirical analysis (polls in Russia, 1994–2013 data). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 12, 99–110 (in Russian).
  30. Sršen A., Dizdarevič S. (2014). Precariousness among young people and student population in the Czech Republic. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(21), 161–168.
  31. Standing G. (2011). The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  32. Stuth S., Jahn K. (2020). Young, successful, precarious? Precariousness at the entry stage of employment careers in Germany. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(6), 702–725. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2019.1636945
  33. Toshchenko Zh.T. (Ed.). (2020). Prekariat: stanovlenie novogo klassa [Precariat: The Emergence of a New Class]. Moscow: Tsentr sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga.
  34. Umicevic A., Arzenšek A., Franca V. (2021). Precarious work and mental health among young adults: A vicious circle? Managing Global Transitions, 19(3), 227–247. DOI: 10.26493/1854-6935.19.227-247

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article