RuEn

Journal section "Social development"

University Partnership System as a Factor in the Development of Youth Entrepreneurship

Doroshenko S.V., Eroshenko E.P.

Volume 11, Issue 6, 2018

Doroshenko S.V., Eroshenko E.P. University partnership system as a factor in the development of youth entrepreneurship. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 244-258. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.6.60.15

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.6.60.15

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Global'noe issledovanie zanyatosti i molodezhnogo predprinimatel'stva. Ernst&Young [Ernst&Young Global Study on Employment and Youth Entrepreneurship]. 2015. Available at: http://www.iblfrussia.org/upload/iblock/109/WEOY2015_JobSurvey_RUS.pdf (accessed June 23, 2018).
  2. Clemensson M., Christensen J.D. How to Build an Enabling Environment for Youth Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Enterprises. Geneva: International labor office, 2010.
  3. Chigunta F. Youth Entrepreneurship: Meeting the Key Policy Challenges. Wolfson College; Oxford University (UK), 2002.
  4. Brister M. How to Support Youth Entrepreneurship. CIPE Development Blog, 2013.
  5. Saulina Yu.P. Development of entrepreneurial activity in the Russian Federation. Predprinimatel'stvo–XXI=Entrepreneurship–XXI, 2015, no. 7, pp. 128-135. (In Russian).
  6. Suelda de Albuquerque Ferreira et al. Migration in times of crisis: can entrepreneurship be a solution? The case of Brazilian entrepreneurs in Lisbon (Portugal). Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2017, no. 4, vol.10, pp. 242-258. DOI: 10.15838/esc/2017.4.52.14. (In Russian).
  7. Golovina T., Merkulov P., Polyanin A. Strategic vectors of the development of the state support of youth entrepreneurship in Russia. Ekonomicheskaya Politika=Economic Policy, 2017, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 42-61. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2017-5-03. (In Russian).
  8. Doroshenko S.V., Solomatin Ya.I. The youth factor socio-economic development of the Russian metropolis. Regional'naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal=Regional Economics and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal, 2015, no. 1, vol. 41, pp. 13-30. (In Russian).
  9. Doroshenko S.V.Study of relationship and willingness of young people of the Sverdlovsk region to engage in small business. Regional'naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal=Regional Economics and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal, 2016, no. 4 (48), pp. 206-222.
  10. Etzkowitz Н. The Triple Helix: University — Industry — Government Innovation in Action. Routledge, 2008. P. 180. DOI: 10.4324/9780203929605.
  11. Dezhina I.G. Features of the Russian “Triple helix” of relations of the state, science and business. Innovatsii=Innovations, 2011, no. 4, pp. 47-55. (In Russian).
  12. Siegel D.S., Waldmann D., Atwater L.E., Link A. Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2004, no. 21(1/2), p. 42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
  13. Santoro M., Chakrabarti A.K. Firm Size and Technology Centrality in Industry-University Interactions. Research Policy, 2002, no. 31(7), p. 80. DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00190-1.
  14. Gupta A.K., Wilemon D. Changing patterns in industrial R&D management. Journal of Product and Innovation Management, 1996, no. 13(6). 1996. pp. 497–51. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.1360497.
  15. Wessner C., Wolff A. Rising to the Challenge: US Innovation Policy for the Global Economy. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. 2012. pp. 110-111. DOI: 10.17226/13386.
  16. Johnson W. The Collaboration Imperative: Universities and Industry as Partners in the 21st Century Knowledge Economy. 2004. Available at: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/pga_051414.pdf (accessed June 24, 2018).
  17. Baaken T., Schröder C. The Triangle for Innovation in Technology Transfer at University of Applied Sciences. Higher Education Institutions and Innovation in the Knowledge Society, Helsinki, 2008. Pp. 103-116.
  18. Plewa C., Quester P., Baaken T. Relationship marketing and university-industry linkages: a conceptual framework. Marketing Theory, 2005, vol. 5(4), pp. 433-456. DOI: 10.1177/1470593105058824.
  19. Zinevich O.V., Balmasova T.A. “The third mission” and social engagement of universities. Vlast’=The Authorities, 2015, no 6, pp. 67–72. (In Russian).
  20. Charles D.R. Universities and Engagement with Cities, Regions and Local Communities. Rebalancing the Social and Economic. Learning. Leicester: NIACE, 2005. Pp. 148–150.
  21. Perfil'eva O.V. The University in the region: steps towards third mission. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii=International Organisations Research Journal, 2011, no. 1(32), pp. 133–144. (In Russian).
  22. Reznik G.A., Ponomarenko Yu.S., Kurdova M.A. Functions of the university: new development opportunities. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya=World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2014, no. 4. Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/30PMN414.pdf (accessed September 18, 2018). (In Russian).
  23. House R., Hanges P., Javidan M., Dorfman P., Gupta V. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications, 2004.
  24. Edwards A. The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. New York: The Dryden Press, 1957. p. 177.
  25. Toshchenko Zh.T. Paradoksal'nyi chelovek [Paradoxical Person]. Edition 2. Мoscow: YuNITI-DANA, 2008. P. 543.

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article