Journal section "Sectoral economic studies"

Sectoral and Territorial Specifics of Value-Added Chains in Russia: the Input-Output Approach

Lukin E.V.

Volume 12, Issue 6, 2019

Lukin E.V. Sectoral and territorial specifics of value-added chains in Russia: the input-output approach. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2019, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 129–149. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.7

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.7

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Granberg A.G. Osnovy regional'noi ekonomiki [Basics of regional economy]. Moscow: GU HSE, 2004. 495 p.
  2. Gubanov S. Neo-industrial development paradigm: A brief summary. Ekonomist=Economist, 2017, no 11, pp. 22–39. (In Russian).
  3. Lukin E.V. Trends of the development of Russian socio-economic space. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues, 2014, no. 7 (17). Available at: (In Russian).
  4. Kul'kov V.M. Is the transition period in the Russian economy finished? Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2015, no. 4 (40), pp. 45–59. (In Russian).
  5. Muradov K.Yu. Is Russia embedded in global value chains? Vestnik NGUEU=Bulletin of NSUEM, 2015, no. 4, pp. 92–117. (In Russian).
  6. Kaplinsky R. Globalisation and unequalisation: what can be learned from value chain analysis? Journal of Development Studies, 2000, vol. 37 (2), pp. 117–146. DOI: 10.1080/713600071.
  7. Shirov A.A. Use of “input-output” tables to justify economic policy decisions. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2018, no. 6, pp. 12–25. (In Russian).
  8. Miller R.E., Blair P.D. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 768 p.
  9. Oosterhaven J., Hewings G. Interregional input-output models. In: Handbook of Regional Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014. Pp. 875–901. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_43.
  10. Cadarso M.A., Monsalve F., Arce G. Emissions burden shifting in global value chains – winners and losers under multi-regional versus bilateral accounting. Economic Systems Research, 2018, vol. 30 (4), pp. 439–461. DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2018.1431768.
  11. Granberg A.G., Suslov V.I., Suspitsyn S.A. Economic and mathematical research of multi-regional systems. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya=Region: Economics and Sociology, 2008, no. 2, pp. 120–150. (In Russian).
  12. Faturay F., Lenzen M., Nugraha K. A new sub-national multi-region input-output database for Indonesia. Economic Systems Research, 2007, vol. 29 (2), pp. 234–251. DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2017.1304361.
  13. Oosterhaven J., Polenske K.R. Modern regional input-output and impact analyses. Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories, 2009. Pp. 423–439.
  14. Zhang Z., Shi М., Zhao Z. The Compilation of China’s interregional input-output model 2002. Economic Systems Research, 2015, vol. 27 (2), pp. 238–256. DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2015.1040740.
  15. Mi Z., Meng J., Zheng H., Shan Y., Wei Y.M., Guan D. A multi-regional input-output table mapping China’s economic outputs and interdependencies in 2012. Scientific Data, 2018, vol. 5, article number: 180155. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.155.
  16. Antràs P., Chor D., Fally T., Hillberry R. Measuring the upstreamness of production and trade flows. American Economic Review, 2012, vol. 102 (3), pp. 412–416. DOI: 10.3386/w17819.
  17. Fally T. Production Staging: Measurement and Facts. University of Colorado-Boulder, 2012. 64 p.
  18. Miller R.E., Temurshoev U. Output upstreamness and input downstreamness of industries/countries in world production. International Regional Science Review, 2017, vol. 40 (5), pp. 443–475. DOI: 10.1177/0160017615608095.
  19. Fally T. On the Fragmentation of Production in the US. University of Colorado-Boulder, 2011. 49 p.
  20. Chen B. Upstreamness, exports, and wage inequality: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing data. Journal of Asian Economics, 2017, vol. 48, pp. 66–74.
  21. Ju J., Yu X. Productivity, profitability, production and export structures along the value chain in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2015, vol. 43 (1), pp. 33–54.
  22. Hagemejer J., Tyrowicz J. Upstreamness of employment and global financial crisis in Poland: The role of position in global value chains. Economics of European Crises and Emerging Markets, 2017, pp. 217–236. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5233-0_10.
  23. Ito T., Vézina P.-L. Production fragmentation, upstreamness, and value-added: Evidence from factory Asia 1990–2005. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2016, vol. 42, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjie.2016.08.002.
  24. Beladi H., Chakrabarti A., Hollas D. Cross-border mergers and upstreaming. World Economy, 2017, vol. 40 (3), pp. 598–611. DOI: 10.1111/twec.12320.
  25. Kuznetsov D., Sedalishchev V. Study of an average position of Russian economic sectors in value-added chains. Ekonomicheskaya Politika=Economic Policy, 2018, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 48–63. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-2-03. (In Russian).
  26. Lukin E.V. Assessment of a position of Russian regions’ economy in value-added chains. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 2019, no. 2 (100), pp. 27–36. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2019.2.100.1. (In Russian).
  27. Ilyin V.A., Povarova A.I. Problems of regional development as a reflection of efficiency of public administration. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 2014, no. 3 (39), pp. 48–63. (In Russian).

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article