Journal section "Theoretical and methodological issues"

Modeling Socio-Demographic Asymmetry of Territorial Development

Makarova M.N.

Volume 14, Issue 2, 2021

Makarova M.N. Modeling socio-demographic asymmetry of territorial development. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 29–42. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.2

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.2

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Makarova M.N., Trushkova E.A. Review of theoretical approaches to the study of socio-demographic asymmetry of territorial development. Zhurnal fundamental'nykh issledovanii=Fundamental Research, 2020, no. 9, pp. 67–72. DOI: 10.17513/fr.42846 (in Russian).
  2. Akperov I.G., Bryukhanova N.V. Managing the region sustainable development in terms of socio-economic processes local asymmetry. Uchenye zapiski Instituta upravleniya, biznesa i prava. Seriya: Ekonomika=Scholarly Notes of the Institute of Management, Business and Law. Series: Economics, 2014, no. 4, pp. 8–17 (in Russian).
  3. Misakov V., Misakov A., Tsurova L., Eskiyev M., Ilayeva Z. Some asymmetry problems of the socio-economic and political relations of territorial subjects of the Russian Federation. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 2017, vol. 6 (5), pp. 247–255. DOI:
  4. Kuznetsova I.I. The problem of territorial differentiation in the regional economy and the possibility of its study at the city level. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza RAN=Proceeding of the Institute for Systems Analysis of the Russian Academy of Science, 2006, vol. 22, pp. 261–268 (in Russian).
  5. Lavrovskii B.L. Measuring regional asymmetry on the example of Russia. Voprosy statistiki=Voprosy Statistiki, 1999, no. 3, pp. 45–52 (in Russian).
  6. Turgel' I.D. Local asymmetry of regional development: Content, assessment, socio-economic consequences. In: Problemy, uspekhi i trudnosti perekhodnoi ekonomiki (Opyt Rossii i Belarusi) [Problems, successes and difficulties of the economy in transition (experience of Russia and Belarus)]. Ed. by M.A. Portnoi. Moscow: Mosk. obshchestv. nauch. fond, 2000. Pp. 233–243 (in Russian).
  7. Mysakov V.S., Mysakov A.V. Problems of leveling of the territorial asymmetry of depressed republics of the North Caucasus. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatel'skii zhurnal=International Research Journal, 2017, no. 9 (63), part 1, pp. 19–26 (in Russian).
  8. Shil'tsin E.A. Regional asymmetry assessment issues. In: Aktual'nye problemy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: vzglyad molodykh uchenykh: sb. nauch. tr. [Urgent problems of socio-economic development: The view of young scientists: Collection of research papers]. Ed. by V.E. Seliverstov, V.M. Markova, E.S. Gvozdeva. Novosibirsk: IEOPP SO RAN, 2005. Pp. 143–158 (in Russian).
  9. Kondusova V.B., Bakhina V.A. Variation analysis of the labor market in administrative-territorial formations of the Orenburg region. Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii=Intellect. Innovation. Investments, 2019, no. 3, pp. 27–35 (in Russian).
  10. Anikina V.I., Kuz'mich R.I. The smoothing of social-economical differentiation in development of municipal formations in urban agglomeration. Vestnik SibGAU=Siberian Journal of Science and Technology, 2010, no. 2, pp. 183–188 (in Russian).
  11. Turgel' I.D., Pobedin A.A. Territorial differentiation of socio-economic development of municipalities in the constituent entity of the Russian Federation: the experience of variational analysis (on the example of the Sverdlovsk region). Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2007, no. 12, pp. 12–23 (in Russian).
  12. Proekt SIRENA: metody izmereniya i otsenki regional'noi asimmetrii [SIRENA Project: Methods for Measuring and Assessing Regional Asymmetry]. Novosibirsk: IEOPP SO RAN, 2002. 248 p.
  13. Roy O.M., Yudina M.A. Heuristic possibilities of the multi-parametric model of structural diagnostics of the development of the regional systems. Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta=Journal of New Economy, 2014, no. 2 (52), pp. 62–68 (in Russian).
  14. Evchenko A.V. Application of economic and mathematical methods for the analysis of territorial socio-economic asymmetry and the choice of targets for the development of districts. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika i upravlenie»=Vestnik of Samara University. Economics and Мanagement, 2005, no. 2, pp. 191–197 (in Russian).
  15. Trotskovskii A.Ya., Mishchenko I.V. Spatial transformations research in the regional economic system. Izvestiya Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta=Izvestiya of Altai State University, 2015, no. 2 (86), vol. 1, pp. 181–187 (in Russian).
  16. Taran O.L. Indikativnaya otsenka sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo sostoyaniya i razvitiya regional'noi ekonomiki: monografiya [Indicative Assessment of the Socio-Economic State and Development of the Regional Economy: Monograph]. Kislovodsk: T'yutor, 2007. 332 p.
  17. Gubanova K.S., Klesh V.S. Methods to evaluate uneven socio-economic development of a region. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory's Development, 2018, no. 6 (98), pp. 30–41. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2018.6.98.2 (in Russian).
  18. Benguigui L., Blumenfeld-Lieberthal E. A dynamic model for city size distribution beyond Zipfs law. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2007, vol. 384 (2), pр. 613–627. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.05.059
  19. Wu Y., Jiang M., Chang Zh. et al. Does China's urban development satisfy Zipf's law? A multiscale perspective from the NPP-VIIRS nighttime light data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17 (1), no. 1460. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041460
  20. Manaeva I.V. Distribution of cities in federal Districts of Russia: Testing of the Zipf law. Economy of Region, 2019, vol.‏ 15 (1), pp. 84–98. DOI: 10.17059/2019-1-7
  21. Lanzieri G. Is fertility converging across the member states of the European Union? In: Work Session on Demographic Projections. Lisbon, 28-30 April 2010. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union, 2010. Pp. 137–154.
  22. Spijker J., Recano J., Martinez S. et al. Mortality by cause of death in Colombia: A local analysis using spatial econometrics. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2020 August. DOI: 10.1007/s10109-020-00335-1
  23. Manesh S.N., Choi, J.O., Shrestha B.K. et al. Spatial analysis of the gender wage gap in architecture, civil engineering, and construction occupations in the United States. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2020, vol. 4, no. 04020023. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000780
  24. Mansour Sh., Saleh E., Al-Awadhi T. The effects of sociodemographic characteristics on divorce rates in Oman: Spatial modeling of marital separations. Professional Geographer, vol. 72 (3), pp. 332–347. DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2020.1730196
  25. Lavrikova Ju.G., Suvorova A.V. Spatial aspects of regional infrastructure distribution (the case of Sverdlovsk region). R-Economy, 2019, vol. 5 (4), pp. 155–167.
  26. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988. 304 p.
  27. Introduction to Spatial Analysis. Invited Lecture. Population Science and GIS Workshop. UC Santa. 2006. 207 p.
  28. Moran P. The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1948, vol. 10, pp. 243–251.
  29. Pavlov Yu.V., Koroleva E.N. Spatial interactions: Evaluation with the help of global and local Moran’s index. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 2014, no. 3, pp. 95–110. DOI: 10.14530/se.2014.3.95-110 (in Russian).
  30. Kozlova O.A., Makarova M.N. Inter-municipal cooperation as an institution of strategic development of territories. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 132–144. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.3.57.9 (in Russian).

View full article