RuEn

Journal section "Social and economic development"

Urban Environment as a Resource for Combining Professional and Parental Functions

Bagirova A.P., Notman O.V., Blednova N.D.

Volume 14, Issue 3, 2021

Bagirova A.P., Notman O.V., Blednova N.D. Urban environment as a resource for combining professional and parental functions. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 199–214. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.3.75.12

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.3.75.12

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Maclnnes J. Work-Life balance in Europe: A response for the baby bust or reward for the baby boomers? European Societies, 2006, vol. 8 (2), pp. 223–249. DOI: 10.1080/14616690600644988
  2. Rozhdestvenskaya E.Yu. Academic careers of women: The balances and mbalances of life and work. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomichekie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes, 2019, no. 3, pp. 27–47. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.3.03 (in Russian).
  3. Remery C., Schippers J. Work-family conflict in the European Union: The impact of organizational and public facilities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, vol. 16 (22). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224419
  4. Brauner C., Wöhrmann A.M., Frank K., Michel A. Health and work-life balance across types of work schedules: A latent class analysis. Applied Ergonomics, 2019, vol. 81. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102906
  5. McCanlies E., Mnatsakanova A., Andrew M., Violanti J., Hartley T. Childcare stress and anxiety in police officers moderated by work factors. Policing: An International Journal, 2019, vol. 42 (6), pp. 992–1006. DOI: 10.1108/PIJPSM-10-2018-0159
  6. Rozhdestvenskaya E.Yu., Isupova O.G. Work-life balance: Family, leisure, and professional activity. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomichekie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes, 2019, no. 3, pp. 3–7. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.3.01 (in Russian).
  7. Kalabikhina I.E., Shaikenova Zh. D. Estimation of time transfers within households. Demografichiskoye Obozrenie=Demographic Review, 2019, no. 5 (4), pp. 36–65 (in Russian).
  8. Patrushev V.D. Zhizn' gorozhanina (1965–1998) [Life of a Citizen (1965–1998)]. Moscow: Academia, 2000.
  9. Nartova N.А. Motherhood in contemporary Western sociological debate. Zhenshhina v rossiiskom obschestve=Woman in Russian Society, 2016, no. 3 (80), pp. 39–53 (in Russian).
  10. Avdeeva A., Isupova O., Kuleshova A., Chernova Zh., Shpakovskaja L. Roditel'stvo 2.0: Pochemu sovremennye roditeli dolzhny razbirat'sa vo vsem? [Parenting 2.0: Why modern parents should understand everything?] Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2021. 164 p.
  11. Isupova O.G. Intensive motherhood in Russia: Mothers, daughters, and sons in school growing. Neprikosnovennyi zapas. Debaty o politike i kul'ture=Inviolable Reserve. Debates about Politics and Culture, 2018, no. 3, pp. 180–189 (in Russian).
  12. Olivetti C., Petrongolo B. The economic consequences of family policies: Lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017, vol. 31 (1), pp. 205–230. DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.1.205
  13. Stanczyk A. Does paid family leave improve household economic security following a birth? Evidence from California. Social Service Review, 2019, vol. 93 (2). DOI: 10.1086/703138
  14. Breeschoten L., Evertsson M. When does part-time work relate to less work-life conflict for parents? Moderating influences of workplace support and gender in the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Community, Work & Family, 2019, vol. 22 (5), pp. 606–628. DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2019.1581138
  15. Beham B., Drobnič S., Präg P., Baierl A. & Eckner J. Part-time work and gender inequality in Europe: A comparative analysis of satisfaction with work–life balance. European Societies, 2019, vol. 21 (3), pp. 378–402. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2018.1473627
  16. Gehl J. Cities for People. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2012. 276 p.
  17. Bor'ba za gorozhanina: Chelovecheskii potentsial i gorodskaya sreda [Struggle for the citizen: Human potential and urban environment]. Ed. by A. Vysokovsky. Moscow: NRU HSE Graduate School of Urbanism; IV Moscow Urban Forum, 2014. 102 p.
  18. Kabisch S., Koch F., Gawel E., Haase A., Knapp S., Krellenberg K., Nivala J., Zehnsdorf A. Urban Transformations: Sustainable Urban Development through Resource Efficiency, Quality of Life and Resilience. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018. 384 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59324-1(2018)
  19. Naberushkina E.K. A city for everyone: Sociological analysis of accessibility of urban space for disabled people. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii=The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2011, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 119–139 (in Russian).
  20. Shabunova A.A., Natsun L.N. The urban environment accessibility for people with disabilities. Voprosy territorialnogo razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues, 2014, no. 3 (13), pp. 1–15 (in Russian).
  21. Lebedeva E.V. Children and youth in a modern city: Sociological analysis. Sotsiologiya=Sociology, 2013, no. 2, pp. 122–132 (in Russian).
  22. Filipova A.G., Lebedeva E.V. Child and youth friendliness of the urban environment: From theoretical approaches to expert interpretations. Oikumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya=Ojkumena. Regional Researches, 2019, no. 2. pp. 101–112 (in Russian).
  23. Balakireva M.S. Everyday mobility study of town dwellers with children: Application of mixed method research strategy. Interaktsiya. Interv'yu. Interpretatsiya=Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 2015, no. 10, pp. 60–69 (in Russian).
  24. Shpakovskaya L.L., Chernova Zh.V. A family-friendly city: A new public space for children and their parents. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomichekie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes, 2017, no. 2, pp. 160–177 (in Russian).
  25. Kienko T.S. Elderly citizens and the audiovisual environment of the city: Age as a factor of solidarity with space. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii=The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2019, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 57–87. DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2019.22.4.3 (in Russian).
  26. Van Hoof J., Kazak K.J., Perek-Białas M.J., Peek T.M.S. The challenges of urban ageing: Making cities age-friendly in Europe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, vol. 15. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112473
  27. Glazychev V.L. Sotsial'no-Ekologicheskaya Interpretaciya Gorodskoy Sredy [Socio-Ecological Interpretation of Urban Environment]. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. 180 p.
  28. Dridze T.M. Human and urban environment in predictive social design. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'=Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 1994, no. 1, pp. 131–138 (in Russian).
  29. Moreno C. Droit de cité, de la “ville-monde” à la “ville du quart d’heure”. De l’Observatoire, 2020. 179 p.
  30. Mulíˇcek O., Osman R., Seidenglanz D. Urban rhythms: A chronotopic approach to urban timespace. Time & Society, 2014, vol. 24 (3), pp. 304–325. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X14535905
  31. Maksimov A.M., Nenasheva M.V., Vereshchagin I.F., Shubina T.F., Shubina P.V. Creating a comfortable urban environment: Problems of interaction between society and government in the implementation of priority projects at the management municipal level. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, Prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 1. pp. 71–90. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.6 (in Russian).

View full article