RuEn

Journal section "Social and economic development"

Issues of the Methodology for Assessing Social Well-Being in Contemporary Russia

Maksimov A.M., Tutygin A.G., Malinina K.O., Chizhova L.A., Blynskaya T.A.

Volume 15, Issue 2, 2022

Maksimov A.M., Tutygin A.G., Malinina K.O., Chizhova L.A., Blynskaya T.A. (2022). Issues of the methodology for assessing social well-being in contemporary Russia. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(2), 138–155. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.9

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.9

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Altindag D.T., Xu J. (2017). Life satisfaction and preferences over economic growth and institutional quality. Journal of Labor Research, 38, 100–121. DOI: 10.1007/s12122-016-9235-2
  2. Bacchini F., Baldazzi B., Di Biagio L. (2020). The evolution of composite indices of well-being: An application to Italy. Ecological Indicators, 117. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X20305409 (accessed: February 1, 2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106603
  3. Chernysh M.F. (2020). Social well-being and health. INAB. Sub’’ektivnoe i ob’’ektivnoe blagopoluchie v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestve: rezul’taty empiricheskogo issledovaniya=Information and Analytical Bulletin (INAB). Subjective and Objective Well-Being in Contemporary Russian Society: Results of Empirical Study, 1, 54–74. DOI: 10.19181/INAB.2020.1.4 (in Russian).
  4. Diener E., Suh E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1–2), 189–216. DOI: 10.1023/a:1006859511756
  5. Fors F., Kulin J. (2016). Bringing affect back in: Measuring and comparing subjective well-being across countries. Social Indicators Research, 127, 323–339. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-015-0947-0
  6. Gulyás A. (2016). Subjective well-being and work – a brief review on international surveys and results. Intersections East European Journal of Society and Politics, 2(1), 74–97. DOI: 10.17356/ieejsp.v2i1.187
  7. Kochurov B.I., Lobkovskii V.A., Smirnov A.Ya. (2018). Effektivnost’ i kul’tura prirodopol’zovaniya [Efficiency and Culture of Environmental Management]. Moscow: RUSAINS.
  8. Korobov V.B. (2005). Comparative analysis of methods for determining the weighting coefficients of “influencing factors”. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskie modeli=Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling, 20, 54–73 (in Russian).
  9. Kuchenkova A.V. (2016). Social well-being and subjective well-being: Correlation of concepts and measurement methods. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Iskusstvovedenie=Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Art History, 2(4), 118–127 (in Russian).
  10. Lapin N.I., Belyaeva L.A. (2010). Programma i tipovoi instrumentarii “Sotsiokul’turnyi portret regiona Rossii” (Modifikatsiya-2010) [Program and Standard Tools “Socio-Cultural Portrait of the Russian Region” (Modification-2010)]. Moscow: MFRAN. Available at: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/scult/titul.pdf (accessed: February 1, 2022).
  11. Leont’ev D.A. (2020). Happiness and well-being: Toward the construction of the conceptual field. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 1, 14–37. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.02 (in Russian).
  12. Litvak B.G. (2004). Ekspertnye tekhnologii v upravlenii [Expert Technologies in Management]. Moscow: Delo.
  13. Lysukho A.S. (2020). Review of Russian studies on the topic of “social well-being”: Main studies and results. Sub’’ektivnoe i ob’’ektivnoe blagopoluchie v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestve: rezul’taty empiricheskogo issledovaniya=Information and Analytical Bulletin (INAB). Subjective and Objective Well-Being in Contemporary Russian Society: Results of Empirical Study, 1, 7–17. DOI: 10.19181/INAB.2020.1.1 (in Russian).
  14. Malkina M.Yu. (2017). Social well-being of the Russian Federation regions. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 13(1), 49–62. DOI: 10.17059/2017-1-5 (in Russian).
  15. Michalos A.C., Hatch P.M. (2020). Good societies, financial inequality and secrecy, and a good life: From Aristotle to Piketty. Applied Research Quality Life, 15, 1005–1054. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-019-09717-0
  16. Morozova T.V., Belaya R.V., Murina S.G. (2013). Quality of life assessment based on indicators of socio-economic well-being of people. Trudy Karel’skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN=Transactions of KarRC RAS, 5, 140–145 (in Russian).
  17. Myers D.G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55(1), 56–67. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56
  18. Myers D.G., Diener E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6(1), 10–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00298.x
  19. Putnam R.D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. DOI: 10.1353/jod.1995.0002
  20. Romashkina G.F., Kryzhanovskii O.A., Romashkin G.S. (2015). Evaluation of the components of social well-being of the population in the Arctic region. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie)=M.I.R. (Modernization. Innovation. Research), 6(4), 58–59. DOI: 10.18184/2079-4665.2015.6.4.58.63 (in Russian).
  21. Saaty T.L. (2009). Prinyatie reshenii pri zavisimostyakh i obratnykh svyazyakh: analiticheskie seti [Decision-Making with Dependencies and Feedbacks: Analytical Networks]. Moscow: Librokom.
  22. Stiglitz J., Sen A.K., Fitoussi J.-P. (2009). The Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress Revisited: Reflections and Overview. Available at: https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01069384/document (accessed: February 1, 2022).
  23. Tatarova G.G. (2002). Qualitative methods in the structure of data analysis methodology. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskie modeli=Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling, 14, 33–52 (in Russian).
  24. Tomashevskii I.L. (2014). Estimation of the error of the hierarchy analysis method. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody=Economics and Mathematical Methods, 1, 55–60 (in Russian).
  25. Toscano W.N., Molgaray D. (2019). The research studies on quality of life in South America. Applied Research Quality Life, 14, 573–588. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-018-9605-4
  26. Tutygin A.G., Korobov V.B. (2010). Advantages and disadvantages of the analytic hierarchy process. Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena. Seriya “Estestvennye i tochnye nauki”=Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 122, 108–115 (in Russian).
  27. Tutygin A.G., Korobov V.B., Men’shikova T.V. (2020). Combined method for calculating weighing coefficients in multi-factor economic models. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov=Bulletin of Civil Engineers, 3(80), 221–228. DOI: 10.23968/1999-5571-2020-17-3-221-228 (in Russian).
  28. Verkeev A.M., Volkov V.V., Dmitrieva A.V. et al. (2019). How to study victim of a crime? Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2, 4–31. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.2.01 (in Russian).

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article