RuEn

Journal section "Regional economics"

Modern Development of the System of Cities in Russia: Static and Dynamic Approaches

Rastvortseva S.N., Manaeva I.V.

Volume 16, Issue 1, 2023

Rastvortseva S.N., Manaeva I.V. (2023). Modern development of the system of cities in Russia: Static and dynamic approaches. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(1), 55–67. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.1.85.3

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.1.85.3

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Albouy D. (2009). What are cities worth? Land rents, local productivity, and the value of amenities. NBER WP, 14981, 25.
  2. Becattini G. (1989). Modelli locali di sviluppo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  3. Blomqvist G., Berger M., Hoehn J. (1988). New estimates of the quality of life in urban areas. Am Econ Rev, 78(1), 89–107.
  4. Boschma R.A., Iammarino S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Econ Geogr, 85(3), 289–311.
  5. Buvin A.A., Khabarov V.I. (2022). Economic aspects of digitalization in healthcare in Russia. Ploblemy teorii i practiki uptavlenia=International Journal of Management Theory and Practice, 1, 26–39. DOI: 10.46486/0234-4505-2022-01-26-39 (in Russian).
  6. Camagni R. (1991). Technological change, uncertainty and innovation networks: towards a dynamic theory of economic space. In: Camagni R. (Ed.). Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven-Pinter.
  7. Camagni R., Capello R., Caragliu A. (2017). Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies: Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth. In: Seminal Studies in Regional and Urban Economics. Cham: Springer.
  8. Capello R. (2009). Indivisibilities, synergy and proximity: The need for an integrated approach to agglomeration economies. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie (TESG), 100(2), 145–159.
  9. Carlino G. (1980). Contrast in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh reconsidered. Urban Stud, 17(3), 343–351.
  10. Carlino J., Saiz A. (2008). Beautiful city: Leisure amenities and urban growth. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper SSRN-1280157.
  11. Cheshire P., Sheppard S. (2002). The welfare economics of land use planning. J Urban Econ, 52(2), 242–269.
  12. Chinitz B. (1961). Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc, 51(2), 279–289.
  13. Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Glaeser E.L. (2011). Triumph of the City. New York: Penguin Press.
  15. Henderson J.V. (1985). Economic Theory and the Cities. Orlando, FL: Academic.
  16. Henderson J.V. (2010). Cities and development. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 515–540.
  17. Hoogerbrugge M.M., Burger M.J., Van Oort F.G. (2022). Spatial structure and subjective well-being in North-West Europe. Regional Studies, 56(1), 75–86.
  18. Kolomak E.A. (2022). The contradictory effects of heterogeneous market potential on Russian urban development. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya=Region: Economics and Sociology, 2(114), 228–255. DOI: 10.15372/REG20220210 (in Russian).
  19. Krugman P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, Ma: The MIT Press.
  20. Liu K., Xue Y., Chen Z. et al. (2022). Economic spatial structure of China’s urban agglomerations: Regional differences, distribution dynamics, and convergence. Sustainable Cities and Society, 87, 104253.
  21. Martin P., Mayer T., Mayneris F. (2011). Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. J Urban Econ, 69(2), 182–195.
  22. Meichang W., Bingbing Z. (2020). Examining the impact of polycentric urban form on air pollution: Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 43359–43371. DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-10216-1
  23. Meijers E., Hoogerbrugge M., Cardoso R. (2018). Beyond polycentricity: Does stronger integration between cities in polycentric urban regions improve performance? Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 109(1), 1–21.
  24. Meijers E.J., Burger M.J., Hoogerbrugge M.M. (2016). Borrowing size in networks of cities: City size, network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe. Papers in Regional Science, 95(1), 181–198.
  25. Rastvortseva S.N, Manaeva I.V. (2022a). Modern development of small and medium-sized cities: Trends and drivers. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(1), 110–127. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.1.79 (in Russian).
  26. Rastvortseva S.N, Manaeva I.V. (2022b). Static and dynamic approaches to assessing the economics of agglomeration taking into account the spatial factor: A review of research. In: Kondratev D.V., Pavlov K.V., Osipov A.K. (Eds.) Upravlenie effektivnost’yu i bezopasnost'yu deyatel'nosti khozyaistvuyushchikh sub”ektov i publichnykh obrazovanii: mat-ly Mezhdunar. nauchno-prakt. konf. 25 yanvarya 2022 g. [Management of Efficiency and Safety of Economic Entities and Public Entities: Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference, January 25, 2022]. Izhevsk: Shelest.
  27. Rastvortseva S.N. (2013). Upravlenie razvitiem protsessov kontsentratsii ekonomicheskoi aktivnosti v regione: podkhody novoi ekonomicheskoi geografii [Management of the Development of Economic Activity Concentration Processes in the Region: Approaches of New Economic Geography]. Moscow: Ekon-inform.
  28. Rosenthal S.S., Strange W.C. (2001). The determinants of agglomeration. J Urban Econ, 50(2), 191–229.
  29. Shkiotov S., Markin M. (2020). A model for measuring the impact of productivity and quality of life on national competitiveness. Journal of Regional and International Competitiveness, 1(1), 20–34. Available at: http://jraic.com/index.php/tor/article/view/5
  30. Smirnov O.O., Bezverbnyi V.A. (2022). Potential for developing sectors of the economy of small cities in Russia: Modern trends. Sotsium i vlast’=Society and Power, 1(91), 62–74. DOI: 10.22394/1996-0522-2022-1-62-74 (in Russian).
  31. Storper M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. Eur Urban Reg Stud, 2(3), 191–221.

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article