Golovchin M.A. What kind of teacher does the “school of the future” Need? Possibility of using John Hattie’s approach in Russian education. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2019, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 229–242. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.5.65.15
Yastrebov G.A., Pinskaya M.A., Kosaretskii S.G. Using contextual data for education quality assessment: the experience of tools development and testing. Voprosy obrazovaniya=Educational Studies, 2014, no. 4, pp. 58-95. (In Russian).
Nurmukhamedov G.M. On trends in the development of the educational process. Informatika i obrazovanie=Informatics and Education, 2016, no. 8 (277), pp. 20-29. (In Russian).
Verbitskii A.A. Psychological and pedagogical bases of construction of new models of training. Innovatsionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii=Innovative Projects and Programs in Education, 2011, no. 2, pp. 3-6. (In Russian).
Semenkov V. Two views on the situation in secondary education in the United States: a field study by John Goodlad vs. statistical analysis by Mark Pen Teleskop=Telescope, 2012, no. 5 (95), pp. 23-27. (In Russian).
Goodlad J. Vot chto nazyvaetsya shkoloi [A Place Called School]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2008. 476 p.
Mel'nichuk M.V. Traditional imperative and an innovative paradigm in the context of higher education Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal ekonomiki i obrazovaniya= International Journal of Economics and Education, 2016, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 5-17. (In Russian).
Freinet C. Izbrannye pedagogicheskie sochineniya [Selected Pedagogical Works]. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 304 p.
Mynbaeva A.K. Sovremennye obrazovatel'nye kontseptsii [Modern Educational Concepts]. Almaty: Қazaқ universitetі, 2012. 220 s.
Illich I. Deschooling Society. Harper & Row, 1970. 186 p.
Holt J. Prichiny detskikh neudach [How Children Fail]. Saint Petersburg: Kristall, Del'ta, 1996. 448 p.
Koshchienko I.V., Pokrovskaya L.I. Main directions of home education abroad: genesis and typology. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie= Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2016, no. 4, pp. 213-319. (In Russian).
Luk'yanova A.L. Otdacha ot obrazovaniya: chto pokazyvaet metaanaliz [Return on Education: What Meta-Analysis Shows]. Moscow: NIU VShE. 60 p.
Marzano R.J. A New Era of School Reform: Going Where the Research Takes Us. Aurora, CO: MidContinent Research for Education and Learning, 2000. 101 p.
Hattie J. Vidimoe obuchenie [Visible Learning]. Moscow: Natsional'noe obrazovanie, 2017. 496 p.
Leonidova G.V., Golovchin M.A., Solov'eva T.S. Uchitel' i obrazovatel'naya reforma: vzglyad iz regiona [Teacher and the Educational Reform: a View from the Region]. Vologda: FGBUN VolNTs RAN, 2018. 178 p.
Terhart E. Has John Hattie really found the holy grail of research on teaching? An extended review of Visible Learning. Curriculum Studies, 2011, no. 43(3), pp. 425-438.
Snook I. et al. Invisible Learnings: A commentary on John Hattie’s book “Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement”. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 2009, no. 44(1), pp. 93-106
Eacott S. School leadership and the cult of the guru: the neo-Taylorism of Hattie. School Leadership & Management, 2017, no. 37(4), pp. 413-426. DOI:10.1080/13632434.2017.1327428
Arnold I. John Hattie: Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. International Review of Education, 2011, no. 57(1-2), pp. 219-221. DOI: 10.1007/s11159-011-9198-8
Valeeva N.Sh., Murtazina E.M. Models of effective teaching/learning in Australia. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta= Bulletin of Kazan Technological University, 2014, no. 9, pp. 340-344. (In Russian).
Knudsen H. John Hattie: I’m a statistician, I’m not a theoretician. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2017, no. 3(3), pp. 253-261. DOI: 10.1080/20020317.2017.1415048
Vachkov I.V., Vachkova S.N. Factors promoting educational success of school students (on materials of foreign researches). Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya= Problems of Modern Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 79-90. (In Russian).
Sokolova E.A. “Visible learning” and the federal state educational standard: Russian and world pedagogical experience. In: Filologicheskoe obrazovanie: sovremennye strategii i praktiki [Philological Education: Modern Strategies and Practices]. Issue 6. Saint Petersburg: LOIRO, 2017. Pp. 6-14. (In Russian).
Borisenko N.A. “Barometers” of influence, or factors which have the greatest impact on learning. A review of John C. Hattie (2009) “Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement”. Voprosy obrazovaniya=Educational Studies, 2018, no. 1, pp. 257-265. (In Russian).
Myburgh S.J. Critique of Peer-reviewed Articles on John Hattie’s Use of Meta-Analysis in Education. University of Bath Department of Education. 26 p.
McKnight L., Whitburn B. Seven reasons to question the hegemony of Visible Learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2018.1480474
Agamirov L.V., Agamirov V.L., Vestyak V.A. Investigation of the distribution of the coefficient of variation in the problems of statistical analysis of tests. Programmnye produkty i sistemy= Software Products and Systems. 2018. №1. S. 166-171.
Ponomareva A. TALIS lessons for school principals. Upravlenie shkoloi= School Management, 2014, no. 10, pp. 7-11. (In Russian).
Avraamova E.M. et al. Monitoring obshchego obrazovaniya: sotsiologicheskie aspekty [Monitoring of General Education: Sociological Aspects]. Moscow: RANKhiGS, 2019. 67 p.
Ustinova K.A., Gubanova E.S., Leonidova G.V. Chelovecheskii kapital v innovatsionnoi ekonomike [Human Capital in Innovative Economy]. Vologda: ISERT RAN, 2015. 195 p.
Shabunova A.A. Social development and modern demographic challenges. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory's Development, 2014, no. 2 (70), pp. 7-17. (In Russian).
Shabunova A.A. et al. Molodezh' sovremennoi Rossii – klyuchevoi resurs modernizatsii [Young People in Modern Russia – a Key Resource for Modernization]. Vologda: Institut sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya territorii RAN, 2013. 148 p.