Dianov S.V., Antonov M.B., Rigin V.A. Models of Forest Management Institutional Environment Formation at the Regional Level of the Russian Federation. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2020, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 106–124. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.2.68.7
Korchagov S.A., Konyushatov O.A. Rules and regulations for intensive forestry at the federal and regional level (case-study of the Vologda Oblast). In: Intensivnoe ustoichivoe lesnoe khozyaistvo: bar'ery i perspektivy razvitiya: cb. st. [Intensive sustainable forestry: barriers and prospects for development: collection of articles]. Under editorship of N. Shmatkov. Moscow: WWF Rossii, 2013. Pp. 45–83. (in Russian)
Blam Yu.Sh., Mashkina L.V., Babenko T.I., Ermolaev O.V. Russian timber industry complex in the context of the global sector. EKO=ECO, 2013, no. 11, pp. 26–44. (in Russian)
Blam Yu.Sh., Babenko T.I., Mashkina L.V. Forest complex in changing institutional and economic conditions. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta=Bulletin of the Kuzbass State Technical University, 2015, no. 5, pp. 197–204. (in Russian)
Ishmukhametov N.S., Shestakovich A.G., Telyasheva E.A. On organization and economic conditions of forestry in the Northern Russia and Siberia. Vestnik Bashkirsk. un-ta=Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2016, no. 4, pp. 949–952. (in Russian)
Telyasheva E.A. System barriers of Russia’s innovation development. Innovatsionnyi Vestnik Region=Innovative Bulletin Region, 2010, no. 2, pp. 6–11. (in Russian)
Institutsional'nye preobrazovaniya v upravlenii lesami. Opyt stran s perekhodnoi ekonomikoi: problemy i resheniya: mater. seminara (Moskva, Rossiya. 25 fevralya 2003 g.) [Institutional changes in forest management. experience of emerging countries: problems and solutions: materials from the seminar (Moscow, Russia, February 25, 2003]. Moscow: Aleks, 2003. 178 p.
Chernyakevich L.M. Strukturnye i ekonomicheskie reformy sistemy gosudarstvennogo lesoupravleniya i vedeniya lesnogo khozyaistva [Structural and Economic Reforms of the State Forest Administration and Management System]. Ioshkar-Ola: MarGTU, 2004. 260 p.
Moiseev N.A. What kind of breakthrough in the forest affairs of Russia can and should be discussed? Lesnoi vestnik=Forestry Bulletin, 2019, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 8–15. DOI: 10.18698/2542-1468-2019-5-8-15 (in Russian)
Brown G., Reed P. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science, 2000, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 240–247.
Brown G. Relationships between spatial and non-spatial preferences and place-based values in national forests. Applied Geography, vol. 44 (2013), pp. 1–11.
Roger Sedjo. The Future of the Forest Service. Property and Environment Research Center, 2017, vol. 36, no. 1.
Davis C. Western Public Lands and Environmental Politics. New York: Routledge, 2001. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503139
MacCleery D. Re-inventing the United States forest service: Evolution from custodial management, to production forestry, to ecosystem management. Chapter 2. In: Durst P., Brown C., Broadhead J., Suzuki R.; Leslie R., Inoguchi A. (Eds.) Re-inventing forestry agencies: Experiences of institutional restructuring in Asia and the Pacific, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: RAP Publication, 2008/05. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/ai412e/AI412E00.htm
Banerjee O., Macpherson A., Alavalapati J. Toward a Policy of Sustainable Forest Management in Brazil: A Historical Analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development, 2009, no. 18, pp. 130–153. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496509333567
Sekher M. Organized participatory resource management: Insights from community forestry practices in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 2002, no. 3 (3-4), рр. 137–154.
Gregersen H., Contreras-Hermosilla A., White A., Phillips L. Forest governance in federal systems: an overview of experiences and implications for decentralization: work in progress. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. Vii, 2004, 80 p.
Nikolaichuk A.A. Property right on forests as a basis for economic forest relations. Kontury global'nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo=Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2010, no. 4, pp. 122–132. (in Russian)
Filipchuk A.N. On the world experience of forest ownership. Lesokhozyaistvennaya informatsiya=Forestry Information, 2014, no. 3, pp. 75–80. (in Russian)
Lindahl K.B. et al. The Swedish forestry model: More of everything? Forest Policy and Economics, 2017, no. 77, рр 44–55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.012
Ficko A., Lidestav G., Dhubháin Áine Ní, Karppinen H., Zivojinovic I., Westin K. European private forest owner typologies: A review of methods and use. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019, vol. 99, рр. 21–31. ISSN 1389-9341. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010
Liknes Greg C., Nelson Mark D., Butler Brett J. Public and private forest ownership in the conterminous United States. Chapter 6. In: Eredics P., ed. Mapping Forestry. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press, 2010, рр. 21–24.
Rotherham T. RPF (BC, ON ret), Armson K.A. O.C. RPF (ret). The Evolution of Forest Management in Canada: Management Paradigms and Forest Tenure Systems. The Forestry Chronicle, 2016, vol. 92, no. 4, рp. 388–393. Available at: https://pubs.cif-ifc.org/doi/pdfplus/10.5558/tfc2016-071
Halofsky J., Andrews Sh., Edwards J., Johnston M., Nelson H., Peterson D., Schmitt K., Swanston Ch., Williamson T. Adapting forest management to climate change: The state of science and applications in Canada and the United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018. 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.037. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323908260_Adapting_forest_management_to_climate_change_The_state_of_science_and_applications_in_Canada_and_the_United_States
Lawrence A. Forestry in transition: imperial legacy and negotiated expertise in Romania and Poland. Forest Policy Econ, 2009, no. 11, pp. 429–436.
Pyzhev A.I. Impact of the ownership regime on forest use efficiency: Cross-country analysis. Journal of Institutional Studies, 2019, no. 11 (3), pp. 182–193. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.3.182-193 (in Russian)
Scriban R.E., Nichiforel L., Bouriaud L.G., Barnoaiea I., Cosofret V.C., Barbu C.O., Governance of the forest restitution process in Romania: An application of the DPSIR model. Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, 2019, vol. 99 (C), pр. 59–67. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.018
Bouriaud L., Nichiforel L., Weiss G., Bajraktari A., Curovic M., Dobšinská Z., Glavonjic P., Jarský V., Sarvasova Z., Teder M., Zalite Z. Governance of private forests in Eastern and Central Europe: An analysis of forest harvesting and management rights. Annals of Forest Research, 2013, no. 56, рр. 199–215. DOI: 10.15287/afr.2013.54
Simula M. Reforms in forest sector of the Eastern European countries: review and conclusions. In: Institutsional'nye preobrazovaniya v upravlenii lesami. Opyt stran s perekhodnoi ekonomikoi: problemy i resheniya: mater. seminara (Moskva, Rossiya. 25 fevralya 2003 g.) [Institutional Changes in Forest Management. Experience of Emerging Countries: Problems and Solutions: materials from the seminar (Moscow, Russia, February 25, 2003]. Мoscow: Aleks, 2003. 178 p. (in Russian)
Kozyreva G.B. Institutional development of forestry system in modern Russia. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2008, no. 3 (3), pp. 56–66. (in Russian)
Shvetsov A.N., Dianov S.V. Methodology of development of agent-oriented models of complex systems. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta=Cherepovets State University Bulletin, 2019, no. 1 (88), pp. 48–58. DOI: 10.23859/1994-0637-2019-1-88-5 (in Russian)
Gulin K.A., Dianov S.V., Antonov M.B. An agent-based approach to implementing the model of forest restoration. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 2018, no. 1 (93), pp. 83–97. DOI: 10.15838/ptd/2018.2.93.6 (in Russian)