Journal section "Social development"

Maternal Age at First Birth: Dynamics, Regional Differences, Determination

Arkhangel'skii V.N., Kalachikova O.N.

Volume 13, Issue 5, 2020

Arkhangel’skii V.N., Kalachikova O.N. Maternal age at first birth: dynamics, regional differences, determination. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2020, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 200–217. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.12

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.12

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Kalachikova O.N., Korolenko A.V. Patterns of reproductive behavior of population (on the materials of Vologda Oblast). Narodonaselenie=Population, 2018, no. 4, pp. 110–122. DOI: 10.26653/1561-7785-2018-21-4-10 (in Russian).
  2. Kalachikova O.N., Gruzdeva M.A. Changes in reproductive behavior and marriage patterns of the Russian population (based on analysis of Rosstat sample studies). Sotsial'noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 2018, no. 2 (14). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2018.2.14.1 (in Russian).
  3. Shabunova A.A., Rostovskaya T.K. On the necessity to develop models of optimal conditions for the formation and implementation of demographic attitudes. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2020, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 38–57. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.4.70.2 (in Russian).
  4. Lesthaeghe R, van de Kaa DJ. Twee demografische transities? In: Bevolking: groei en krimp. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus, 1986. Рp. 9–24.
  5. Van de Kaa D. Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 1993, vol. 42 (1). 55 p.
  6. Coleman D., Rowthorn R. Who’s afraid of population decline? A Critical examination of its consequences. Population and Development Review, 2011, vol. 37 (demographic transition and its consequences), pp. 217–248.
  7. Frejka T., Sardon J.-P. First birth trends in developed countries: a cohort analysis. Demographic Research, 2006, vol. 15, article 6, pp. 147–180. Available at:
  8. Shcherbakova E.M. Youth of the CIS, demographic portrait. Demoskop Weekly, 2017, no. 711–712. Available at: (in Russian).
  9. Aksyonova S.Y. Advanced maternal age: The case of Ukraine. Демографія та соціальна економіка=Demography and Social Economy, 2014, no. 2 (22), pp. 57–67. Available at: (in Russian).
  10. Аксьонова С.Ю. Середній вік матері при народженні дитини: чи можлива реверсія? Демографія та соціальна економіка, 2018, no. 2 (33), pp. 53–66.
  11. Аксьонова С.Ю. Взаємозв’язки середнього віку матері при народженні дитини і рівня народжуваності. Демографія та соціальна економіка, 2019, no. 2 (36), pp. 23–38. Available at:
  12. Ediev D.M. On the role of mother's middle age at childbirth in long-term demographic dynamics. Voprosy statistiki=Voprosy statistiki, 2006, no. 11, pp. 23–31 (in Russian).
  13. Fakhrislamova R.T. Postponing the birth of children (first-borns) in Russia and in the world. In: Global'nye vyzovy i regional'noe razvitie v zerkale sotsiologicheskikh izmerenii: materialy III mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi internet konferentsii, 26–30 marta 2018 g.: ch.2 [Global challenges and regional development in the mirror of sociological assessment: Proceedings of the Third international research-to-practice internet-conference, March 26-30, 2018: Part 2]. VolNTs RAN, 2018. Pp. 275–283 (in Russian).
  14. Arkhangelsky V.N., Zinkina Yu.V., Shulgin S.G. Fertility differentiation according to female education levels in Russia: Current situation and forecast scenarios. Narodonaselenie=Population, 2019, no. 1, pp. 21–36 (in Russian).
  15. Gordo L.R. Why are women delaying motherhood in Germany? Feminist Economics, 2009, no. 15:4, pp. 57–75. DOI: 10.1080/13545700903153955
  16. Rostovskaya T.K., Kuchmaeva O.V. Conceptual approaches to conducting the All-Russian sociological study "Demographic Well-Being of Russia" as a tool for monitoring the effectiveness of demographic policy. Vestnik YuRGTU (NPI)=Bulletin of the South-Russian state technical University (NPI), 2020, no. 3, pp. 89–99. DOI: 10.17213/2075-2067-2020-3-89-99 (in Russian).
  17. Kazenin K., Kozlov V. Rejuvenation of the motherhood in Dagestan: A tendency or an artefact? (The preliminary results of the rural population survey). Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 2016, no. 3, pp. 100–123 (in Russian).
  18. Kazenin K.I., Kozlov V.A. Childbearing age in Dagestan: Significance of the ethnic factor under the conditions of modernization. Narodonaselenie=Population, 2017, no. 1, pp. 46–58 (in Russian).
  19. Naselenie Rossii 2016: dvadtsat' chetvertyi ezhegodnyi demograficheskii doklad [Population of Russia 2016: Twenty-fourth annual demographic report]. Ed. by S.V. Zakharov. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2018. Pp.134–136.
  20. Ipatova A.A., Tyndik A.O. Reproductive age: 30 years old in preferences and biographies. Mir Rossii=Universe of Russia, 2015, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 123–148 (in Russian).
  21. Korolenko A.V. Some aspects of the state of a modern “institute of grandmothers”: Experience of sociological research. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 2018, no. 4 (16). DOI: 10.15838/sa. 2018.4.16.3 (in Russian).

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article